* Paul Denning <pauld@mitre.org> [2004-02-27 09:41-0500] > At 04:37 AM 2004-02-27, Hugo Haas wrote: > >The safeness and idempotency of a Web service request are independent > >from the binding used, so it makes sense to express them at the > >operation level. Since an operation could involve any MEP, we need to > >specify that we are talking here about state from the service's point > >of view. > > The SOAP 1.2 Web method feature [1] implies both safe and idempotent when > the property value is GET. > > Has WSDWG come up with a way to use the web method feature in WSDL? I had considered it as a third option in my proposal: using the WMF to qualify operations. It is a different way to qualify them as safe and/or idempotent, with some additional semantics. However, I removed it from my email as I was told that the WG had this discussion, and had decided that it wasn't the way to go with this particular requirement. Regards, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/Received on Friday, 27 February 2004 15:31:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:14:42 GMT