public-webapi@w3.org from January 2007 by author

Alex Russell

• Re: Selectors API naming (Thursday, 4 January)

Alexey Proskuryakov

• [XHR] empty passwords (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: ISSUE-101: Network errors for sync requests (Tuesday, 9 January)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: ISSUE-109: Do loaded/total count the bytes transferred with encodings applied or not? (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: Selectors API: Multiple elements with the same ID (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: New draft of Progress events (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: New draft of Progress events (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: New draft of Progress events (Sunday, 28 January)
• Proposal: getElementsBySelector() (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: [selectors api] Why two methods? (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: [selectors api] Why two methods? (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Selectors API: Multiple elements with the same ID (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Timing Interface (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: [selectors api] Why two methods? (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Timing Interface (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Selectors API: Multiple elements with the same ID (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: [selectors api] Why two methods? (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: [selectors api] Why two methods? (Thursday, 25 January)
• Selectors API naming (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Selectors API updates (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Selectors API updates (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Selectors API updates (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Selectors API updates (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: ISSUE-101: Network errors for sync requests (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: ISSUE-101: Network errors for sync requests (Tuesday, 9 January)
• XMLHttpRequest ready for Last Call (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Clearing the readystatechange listener (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2 (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2 (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: ISSUE-101: Network errors for sync requests (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: ISSUE-105: Do we need an uploadProgress? (Sunday, 7 January)

Antoine Quint

• Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2 (Monday, 8 January)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: Progress event spec (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: New draft of Progress events (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: [selectors api] Why two methods? (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Selectors API: Multiple elements with the same ID (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: [selectors api] Why two methods? (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: New draft of Progress events (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Selectors API: Multiple elements with the same ID (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Fwd: minor clarifications to ProgressEvent (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Selectors API updates (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2 (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: capturing load events (Wednesday, 3 January)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: ISSUE-109: Do loaded/total count the bytes transferred with encodings applied or not? (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: Selectors API: Multiple elements with the same ID (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Selectors API: Multiple elements with the same ID (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Selectors API: Multiple elements with the same ID (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Friday, 26 January)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: Progress event spec (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: Bubbling Re: Progress event spec (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: New draft of Progress events (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: New draft of Progress events (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: New draft of Progress events (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: New draft of Progress events (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: New draft of Progress events (Sunday, 28 January)
• Key events... (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: New draft of Progress events (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Timing Interface (Sunday, 28 January)
• Timing Interface (Saturday, 27 January)
• New draft of Progress events (Saturday, 27 January)
• Frequency Re: Progress event spec (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: new draft of W3C liason stmt (Saturday, 27 January)
• Bubbling Re: Progress event spec (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Saturday, 27 January)
• Frequency Re: Progress event spec (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Fwd: minor clarifications to ProgressEvent (Thursday, 25 January)
• Fwd: minor clarifications to ProgressEvent (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Agenda Request (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2 (Saturday, 6 January)

Christophe Jolif

• Re: Selector API names - strawman (Wednesday, 17 January)

Dave Massy

• Re: Selectors API updates (Wednesday, 10 January)

David Håsäther

• Re: New draft of Progress events (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: New draft of Progress events (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: New draft of Progress events (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: [selectors api] Why two methods? (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: [selectors api] Why two methods? (Thursday, 25 January)
• [selectors api] Why two methods? (Thursday, 25 January)

Doug Schepers

• Re: Key events... (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Editorial Control (Thursday, 25 January)
• Editorial Control (was: Selectors API naming) (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Selector API names - strawman (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Selectors API updates (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 5 January)

Ellen Siegel

• new draft of W3C liason stmt (Tuesday, 23 January)

Hallvord R. M. Steen

• Re: Selectors API naming (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: capturing load events (Wednesday, 3 January)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Editorial Control (was: Selectors API naming) (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Selectors API updates (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2 (Friday, 5 January)

Jean-Claude Dufourd

• Re: Progress event spec (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Monday, 29 January)

Jim Ley

• Re: Progress event spec (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Timing Interface (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: [selectors api] Why two methods? (Thursday, 25 January)

Jon Ferraiolo

• Re: Selectors API naming (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Selectors API updates (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2 (Monday, 8 January)

João Eiras

• Re: Bubbling Re: Progress event spec (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: capturing load events (Monday, 1 January)

Luca Mascaro

• Richiesta aggiornamento informazioni personali (Monday, 15 January)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: Progress event spec (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: ISSUE-109: Do loaded/total count the bytes transferred with encodings applied or not? (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Do progress total/loaded measure body content only, or include respose headers etc.? (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: Selectors API: Multiple elements with the same ID (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() (Sunday, 28 January)
• Progress Use Cases (was Re: Progress event spec) (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Timing Interface (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Selector API names - strawman (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Selectors API updates (Thursday, 11 January)

Martijn

• Re: [selectors api] Why two methods? (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: [selectors api] Why two methods? (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: [selectors api] Why two methods? (Saturday, 27 January)

nandini

• Re: Agenda Request (Thursday, 25 January)
• Agenda Request (Tuesday, 23 January)

Nicolas Mendoza

• Re: Selectors API naming (Thursday, 25 January)

Robert Sayre

• Re: Selectors API: Multiple elements with the same ID (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Progress event spec (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Selectors API updates (Wednesday, 10 January)

Robin Berjon

• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Selector API names - strawman (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Selectors API updates (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2 (Monday, 8 January)

Rowan Nairn

• Multi-touch events (Wednesday, 31 January)

Shadow2531

• Re: capturing load events (Thursday, 4 January)
• Re: capturing load events (Tuesday, 2 January)
• Re: capturing load events (Monday, 1 January)
• Re: capturing load events (Monday, 1 January)

Simon Pieters

• Re: [selectors api] Why two methods? (Saturday, 27 January)
• Selectors API: Multiple elements with the same ID (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Selectors API naming (Thursday, 25 January)

Web APIs Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-111: Should we define how to deal with multiple invocations or defer to initEvent/NS ? (Sunday, 28 January)
• ISSUE-110: Do we need a singular method for getting just one element (Sunday, 28 January)
• ISSUE-109: Do loaded/total count the bytes transferred with encodings applied or not? (Sunday, 28 January)
• ISSUE-108: Do progress total/loaded measure body content only, or include respose headers etc.? (Sunday, 28 January)
• ISSUE-107: Is there a required frequency for progress events? (Saturday, 27 January)
• ISSUE-106: Should Progress be required to fire? (Saturday, 27 January)
• ISSUE-105: Do we need an uploadProgress? (Sunday, 7 January)
• ISSUE-104: Value of progress event total when it cannot be determined (Sunday, 7 January)
• ISSUE-103: Does progress event bubble / is it cancelable (Sunday, 7 January)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 January 2007 18:35:19 UTC