W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > January 2007

Re: New draft of Progress events

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:41:31 +0100
To: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.tmve7hkh64w2qv@id-c0020.nomadprime.subscribe.loganwifi.com>

> ...

* The specification should make it clear that other specifications must  
define when it is to be dispatched. (This should be also be made clear for  
the examples.)

* "The user agent may dispatch a progress event while an asynchronous  
network opertation such as a load event is taking place." doesn't make  
much sense to me.

* "These events should not bubble, and can be canceled." -> "These events  
must not bubble and most be cancelable."

* I think initProgressEvent and initProgressEventNS should just defer to  
initEvent and initEventNS for details on multiple invocations (in case  
that changes at some point).

* What seems to be missing is a normative reference to DOM Level 3 Events.

* The [IEoP] is never referenced. Either reference it or drop the  
reference.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 28 January 2007 15:41:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:56 GMT