- From: Doug Schepers <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:20:50 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Dave Massy <Dave.Massy@microsoft.com>, "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Hi, Anne- Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:14:46 +0100, Dave Massy > <Dave.Massy@microsoft.com> wrote: >> Looking at the feedback on >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/ and Anne's blog entry >> at http://annevankesteren.nl/2006/12/selectors-api-naming it seems that >> the majority of people would agree with these principles and the >> suggested names based on getElementBySelector. > > Just to make sure I understand what "majority" is I took my weblog entry > and counted the various names. +1 are those in favor of the proposal, 0 > are those that didn't express any opinion and -1 are those against the > proposal. Where "proposal" is the shorter name: Given the new information that comments on your blog are preferentially weighted over posts to this W3C list, I've now registered my opinion there. :) Consider me a -1 for "shorter over more descriptive" and a -2 for ".get()" and ".getAll()" (which adroitly marries the worst of both worlds). Regards- -Doug Research and Standards Engineer 6th Sense Analytics www.6thsenseanalytics.com mobile: 919.824.5482
Received on Thursday, 11 January 2007 15:21:04 UTC