Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2

On Jan 09, 2007, at 10:45, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:48:41 +0100, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
>>> Yeah, I agree with that. What's the rationale for not having
>>> "bindings-are-ready" and "bound"?
>>
>> 'bound' on its own is too vague.
>
> Alright, "binding-bound" then.

Cool, another naming thread! I think "bondage-accomplished" is much  
better.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The sound principle of a topsy-turvy lifestyle in the framework of
  an upside-down world order has stood every test."
                         -- Karl Kraus