W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > January 2007

Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:37:11 +0100
Message-Id: <574447D4-533F-4B4D-B44F-5DEFBFCEBD10@berjon.com>
Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, public-webapi@w3.org
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>

On Jan 09, 2007, at 10:45, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:48:41 +0100, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
>>> Yeah, I agree with that. What's the rationale for not having
>>> "bindings-are-ready" and "bound"?
>>
>> 'bound' on its own is too vague.
>
> Alright, "binding-bound" then.

Cool, another naming thread! I think "bondage-accomplished" is much  
better.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The sound principle of a topsy-turvy lifestyle in the framework of
  an upside-down world order has stood every test."
                         -- Karl Kraus
Received on Tuesday, 9 January 2007 12:37:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:56 GMT