W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > January 2007

Re: Selectors API naming

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:18:28 +0000 (UTC)
To: Joćo Eiras <joao.eiras@gmail.com>
Cc: Web APIs WG <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0701251915370.21318@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Joćo Eiras wrote:
> > 
> > Given that this discussion was done behind closed doors, and given 
> > that there is certainly not consensus on this (the first reaction I 
> > saw on IRC to this was "wow, those names suck!")
> 
> I find these much better than all other propositions, and I'm not lazy 
> to type longer method names, if they're descriptive. So, it's a matter 
> of personal opinion that "names suck".

My argument is not that the names suck. My argument is that there is not 
concensus, that the decision process was opaque and behind-closed-doors, 
and that having the working group override the editor on such a trivial 
issue as naming is a bad precedent for open Web spec development.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2007 19:18:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:56 GMT