W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > January 2007

Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 05:00:57 +0100
To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, public-webapi@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tlpr3viewxe0ny@widsith.local>

On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:06:33 +0100, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:

> FYI, the XBL2 spec currently defines two events, 'xbl-bound' and
> 'bindings-are-ready', without namespaces. If anyone thinks that these
> events should be namespaced, please let me know.

In general I think it is good that events are namespaced. In particular,  
if they
are going to be null-namespaced I prefer that the WebAPI, or its successor,
group declares that explicitly as something it approves.

Since you are asking us, I personally have no problem with them being in  
null namespace.

Anyone feel otherwise or can we call consensus on this?



Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
chaals@opera.com Try Opera 9.1 http://opera.com
Received on Saturday, 6 January 2007 04:01:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:22 UTC