W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > January 2007

Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 04:48:41 +0000 (UTC)
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, public-webapi@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0701090448290.22379@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:07:05 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
> wrote:
> > > FYI, the XBL2 spec currently defines two events, 'xbl-bound' and
> > > 'bindings-are-ready', without namespaces. If anyone thinks that these
> > > events should be namespaced, please let me know.
> > 
> > This is fine with me so long as 'bindings-are-ready' is renamed to
> > 'xbl-bindings-are-ready'. Having two XBL-specific events where only
> > one starts with 'xbl-' is rather confusing, and I don't see how the
> > second event neither is XBL-specific nor should be XBL-specific.
> 
> Yeah, I agree with that. What's the rationale for not having
> "bindings-are-ready" and "bound"?

'bound' on its own is too vague.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 9 January 2007 04:48:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:56 GMT