W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > January 2007

Re: Selectors API naming

From: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:51:44 -0500
Message-ID: <68fba5c50701251251o748ec54fq31d7cf57adf9a13b@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jon Ferraiolo" <jferrai@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Joćo Eiras" <joao.eiras@gmail.com>, "Web APIs WG" <public-webapi@w3.org>

On 1/25/07, Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> I encourage you to read the process document

I encourage you to read the WG charter.

Looking over the charter, I see the proceedings of the WG are
Member-Only (bad), but it also states:

"For example, the Working Group should publish specifications often,
send summaries of Working Group activity to a public list and
participate in those public lists, responding to comments in a timely

If the WG doesn't provide public minutes, and doesn't otherwise
respond to public comments from WG members and the general public, I
think it should change its charter to be entirely Member Confidential.
I wouldn't want that, but it seems like it would be more accurate.


Robert Sayre
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2007 20:51:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:22 UTC