W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > January 2007

Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:15:32 +0100
To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: public-webapi@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tlt9v6xn64w2qv@id-c0020>

On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:07:05 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>  
>> FYI, the XBL2 spec currently defines two events, 'xbl-bound' and
>> 'bindings-are-ready', without namespaces. If anyone thinks that these
>> events should be namespaced, please let me know.
> This is fine with me so long as 'bindings-are-ready' is renamed to
> 'xbl-bindings-are-ready'. Having two XBL-specific events where only
> one starts with 'xbl-' is rather confusing, and I don't see how the
> second event neither is XBL-specific nor should be XBL-specific.

Yeah, I agree with that. What's the rationale for not having  
"bindings-are-ready" and "bound"?

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 14:15:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:22 UTC