Re: heads-up on use of unnamespaced event types in XBL2

On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>
> * Ian Hickson wrote:
> >FYI, the XBL2 spec currently defines two events, 'xbl-bound' and 
> >'bindings-are-ready', without namespaces. If anyone thinks that these 
> >events should be namespaced, please let me know.
> 
> This is fine with me so long as 'bindings-are-ready' is renamed to 
> 'xbl-bindings-are-ready'. Having two XBL-specific events where only one 
> starts with 'xbl-' is rather confusing, and I don't see how the second 
> event neither is XBL-specific nor should be XBL-specific.

Okie dokie. I've updated the event to start with xbl like the other one.

Cheers,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 9 January 2007 04:47:40 UTC