www-html@w3.org from February 2000: by thread

Posting without subscribing Sue Sims (Wednesday, 1 March)
Web Form Speech Input for all platforms Miguel Marcos (Wednesday, 1 March)
Web Form Speech Input for Non-Wintel Systems Cesare Cioni (Tuesday, 29 February)
html speech input jmfrenard@free.fr (Tuesday, 29 February)
Non-proprietary web tags Ned Abell (Tuesday, 29 February)
Petition: Web Form Speech Input for Non-Wintel Systems Morriz (Tuesday, 29 February)
The role of the style attribute: HTML WG official position Steven Pemberton (Tuesday, 29 February)
Builder.com discussion on the style attribute Jonny Axelsson (Tuesday, 29 February)
file upload extension Walter Ian Kaye (Tuesday, 29 February)
- Re: file upload extension Jukka.Korpela@hut.fi (Tuesday, 29 February)
  - Re: file upload extension Walter Ian Kaye (Tuesday, 29 February)
- Re: file upload extension Clover Andrew (Tuesday, 29 February)
  - Re: file upload extension Steven Pemberton (Tuesday, 29 February)
  - Re: file upload extension Jukka.Korpela@hut.fi (Tuesday, 29 February)
White Space Scott Violet (Tuesday, 29 February)
Sun's position on device upload James P. Salsman (Tuesday, 29 February)
Petition: Web Form Speech Input for Non-Wintel Systems Lucas Vogel (Monday, 28 February)
Mac user input Jim Culberson (Monday, 28 February)
In support of non proprietary device upload standards. Alessandro Forghieri (Monday, 28 February)
Device Upload Proposal Bluett, Mike (Monday, 28 February)
Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position Steven Pemberton (Monday, 28 February)
- Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position James P. Salsman (Monday, 28 February)
  - Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position Steven Pemberton (Tuesday, 29 February)
    - Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position James P. Salsman (Tuesday, 29 February)
- Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position George Hobbs (Monday, 28 February)
  - Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Monday, 28 February)
    - Re: Device upload for all platforms -- the official HTML WG position Murray Altheim (Monday, 28 February)
Endorse the device upload protocol please bruno.boutteau (Saturday, 26 February)
please endorse upload for all platforms. not just wintel Suzie Blount (Monday, 28 February)
Petition: Web Form Speech Input for Non-Wintel Systems Maria Aretoulaki (Monday, 28 February)
Re: text input form resize Yude.Hu (Monday, 28 February)
- Re: text input form resize Andy Waite (Monday, 28 February)
Device upload for all platforms George Hobbs (Sunday, 27 February)
- Re: Device upload for all platforms Murray Altheim (Monday, 28 February)
- RE: Device upload for all platforms JOrendorff@ixl.com (Monday, 28 February)
  - Resent-From headers (was Re: Device upload for all platforms) Gerald Oskoboiny (Tuesday, 29 February)
Device upload for all platforms Jacob Palme (Sunday, 27 February)
- Re: Device upload for all platforms Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer (Sunday, 27 February)
  - Re: Device upload for all platforms Walter Ian Kaye (Monday, 28 February)
  - Re: Device upload for all platforms Jacob Palme (Monday, 28 February)
suggestions... by way of Alan Kotok (Friday, 25 February)
- Re: suggestions... Nir Dagan (Friday, 25 February)
- RE: suggestions... JOrendorff@ixl.com (Friday, 25 February)
- Re: suggestions... Andy Waite (Saturday, 26 February)
  - Re: suggestions... Walter Ian Kaye (Saturday, 26 February)
  - Re: suggestions... Terje Bless (Saturday, 26 February)
RE: Separating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) David Wagner (Thursday, 24 February)
Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) Murray Altheim (Wednesday, 23 February)
- RE: Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) David Wagner (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) Arjun Ray (Thursday, 24 February)
RE: Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CS S - score so far) Patrice Calve (Wednesday, 23 February)
Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) David Wagner (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) Walter Ian Kaye (Thursday, 24 February)
  - Re: Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) Arjun Ray (Thursday, 24 February)
    - Re: Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) Walter Ian Kaye (Thursday, 24 February)
    - Re: Seperating Document Content from Structure (was RE: inline CSS - score so far) Arjun Ray (Thursday, 24 February)
    - SP's spam Was: (Seperating ...) Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Thursday, 24 February)
inline CSS - score so far JOrendorff@ixl.com (Wednesday, 23 February)
- RE: inline CSS - score so far Dave J Woolley (Wednesday, 23 February)
- RE: inline CSS - score so far David Wagner (Wednesday, 23 February)
  - Re: inline CSS - score so far Murray Altheim (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: inline CSS - score so far Jan Roland Eriksson (Wednesday, 23 February)
- RE: inline CSS - score so far Piers Williams (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: inline CSS - score so far Arjun Ray (Thursday, 24 February)
- Re: inline CSS - Argument for fantasai (Thursday, 24 February)
  - Re: inline CSS - Argument for David Carlisle (Thursday, 24 February)
    - Re: inline CSS - Argument for Daniel Hiester (Saturday, 26 February)
  - Re: inline CSS - Argument for Albert Lunde (Thursday, 24 February)
  - Re: inline CSS - Argument for David Carlisle (Monday, 28 February)
Bidi - HTML vs. CSS Matthew Brealey (Tuesday, 22 February)
- Re: Bidi - HTML vs. CSS Nir Dagan (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: Bidi - HTML vs. CSS Matthew Brealey (Wednesday, 23 February)
XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: STRONG; I, B, (TT) Jonny Axelsson (Tuesday, 22 February)
- Re: XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: STRONG; I, B, (TT) Alan G. Isaac (Tuesday, 22 February)
XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: ACRONYM and BDO Jonny Axelsson (Tuesday, 22 February)
- Re: XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: ACRONYM and BDO Nir Dagan (Tuesday, 22 February)
  - RE: XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: ACRONYM and BDO Jonathan Rosenne (Tuesday, 22 February)
- Re: XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: ACRONYM and BDO Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 22 February)
- Re:XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: ACRONYM and BDO Matthew Brealey (Tuesday, 22 February)
  - Re:XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: ACRONYM and BDO Nir Dagan (Tuesday, 22 February)
    - Re: XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: ACRONYM and BDO Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 22 February)
XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: CODE, VAR, KBD and SAMP Jonny Axelsson (Tuesday, 22 February)
- RE: XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: CODE, VAR, KBD and SAMP JOrendorff@ixl.com (Tuesday, 22 February)
XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization: Introduction Jonny Axelsson (Tuesday, 22 February)
[Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Stephane Bailliez (Tuesday, 22 February)
- RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Dave J Woolley (Tuesday, 22 February)
  - RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 22 February)
  - RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Stephane Bailliez (Tuesday, 22 February)
    - RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 22 February)
    - RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Stephane Bailliez (Tuesday, 22 February)
- RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Patrice Calve (Tuesday, 22 February)
- RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Piers Williams (Tuesday, 22 February)
  - RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 22 February)
- RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Jonny Axelsson (Tuesday, 22 February)
  - RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Stephane Bailliez (Tuesday, 22 February)
- RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Patrice Calve (Tuesday, 22 February)
  - RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Stephane Bailliez (Tuesday, 22 February)
- RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Piers Williams (Tuesday, 22 February)
  - RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 22 February)
- RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Roy.Gardiner@natwest.com (Tuesday, 22 February)
  - RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 22 February)
- RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? Dave J Woolley (Tuesday, 22 February)
- RE: [Q] META "Refresh" deprecated ? JOrendorff@ixl.com (Tuesday, 22 February)
Deprecated or not? Bertilo Wennergren (Monday, 21 February)
- Re: Deprecated or not? Murray Altheim (Monday, 21 February)
  - Re: Deprecated or not? Bertilo Wennergren (Tuesday, 22 February)
    - Re: Deprecated or not? Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 22 February)
    - Re: Deprecated or not? Bertilo Wennergren (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: Deprecated or not? Murray Altheim (Wednesday, 23 February)
W3C Chat before XTech 2000: XHTML - a bridge to the Web of the future Dan Connolly (Monday, 21 February)
- Re: W3C Chat before XTech 2000: XHTML - a bridge to the Web of the future Susan Lesch (Saturday, 26 February)
  - Re: W3C Chat before XTech 2000: XHTML - a bridge to the Web of the future Masayasu Ishikawa (Saturday, 26 February)
passing values through <a href> links Sam Rose (Monday, 14 February)
- Re: passing values through <a href> links Jeffrey (Sunday, 20 February)
  - Re: passing values through <a href> links Sal Candido (Monday, 21 February)
  - Re: passing values through <a href> links Walter Ian Kaye (Monday, 21 February)
Chat Topic: LDO - an XML transport library Ken MacLeod (Saturday, 19 February)
HTML vs socio-political correctness John Pierce (Saturday, 19 February)
- Re: HTML vs socio-political correctness Arjun Ray (Saturday, 19 February)
- Re: HTML vs socio-political correctness Daniel Hiester (Saturday, 19 February)
  - Re: HTML vs socio-political correctness Murray Altheim (Friday, 18 February)
- Re: HTML vs socio-political correctness Tim Greenhoot (Saturday, 19 February)
Discussion (www-html) vs. requests (www-html-editor) Dan Connolly (Friday, 18 February)
URL better than FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Friday, 18 February)
- Re: URL better than FPI Arjun Ray (Friday, 18 February)
  - Re: URL better than FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Saturday, 19 February)
    - Re: URL better than FPI Arjun Ray (Saturday, 19 February)
    - Re: URL better than FPI Dan Connolly (Saturday, 19 February)
    - Re: URL better than FPI Arjun Ray (Sunday, 20 February)
    - Re: URL better than FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Monday, 21 February)
- Re: URL better than FPI David Carlisle (Monday, 21 February)
  - Re: URL better than FPI Murray Altheim (Monday, 21 February)
  - Re: URL better than FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Monday, 21 February)
  - Re: URL better than FPI Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 22 February)
- Re: URL better than FPI David Carlisle (Monday, 21 February)
  - Re: URL better than FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Monday, 21 February)
    - Re: URL better than FPI Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 22 February)
- RE: URL better than FPI Dave J Woolley (Monday, 21 February)
  - Re: URL better than FPI Murray Altheim (Monday, 21 February)
- Re: URL better than FPI David Carlisle (Monday, 21 February)
- RE: URL better than FPI Dave J Woolley (Monday, 21 February)
  - RE: URL better than FPI Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 22 February)
- Re: URL better than FPI David Carlisle (Tuesday, 22 February)
  - Re: URL better than FPI Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 22 February)
    - Re: URL better than FPI Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 22 February)
- Re: URL better than FPI David Carlisle (Tuesday, 22 February)
  - Re: URL better than FPI Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 22 February)
CSS3 Jacob Lindborg (Friday, 18 February)
Unoticed Error in XHTML 1.0? Jelks Cabaniss (Thursday, 17 February)
[www-html] <none> David Carlisle (Thursday, 17 February)
HTTP headers Michael Hamm (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: HTTP headers Dan Connolly (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: HTTP headers Michael Hamm (Thursday, 17 February)
SV: is anyone interested in XHTML? Jacob Lindborg (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Daniel Hiester (Thursday, 17 February)
SV: Ok, here's my suggestion... Jacob Lindborg (Thursday, 17 February)
question/suggestion on input element Nick Traenkner (Wednesday, 16 February)
is anyone interested in XHTML? Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Murray Altheim (Saturday, 12 February)
  - Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Frank Boumphrey (Thursday, 17 February)
- RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? Piers Williams (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Dan Connolly (Thursday, 17 February)
  - Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Maury Markowitz (Thursday, 17 February)
- RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? David Wagner (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Tantek Çelik (Thursday, 17 February)
  - RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? Jelks Cabaniss (Thursday, 17 February)
  - Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Sue Sims (Thursday, 17 February)
    - RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? John W Pierce (Thursday, 17 February)
    - Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Murray Altheim (Thursday, 17 February)
    - inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss (Friday, 18 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jan Roland Eriksson (Friday, 18 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim (Friday, 18 February)
    - RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss (Monday, 21 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim (Monday, 21 February)
    - RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss (Monday, 21 February)
    - RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 22 February)
    - RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Sal Candido (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jeffrey (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Sal Candido (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Susan Lesch (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Sal Candido (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Thursday, 24 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Daniel Hiester (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Sue Sims (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jonny Axelsson (Monday, 21 February)
    - RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Dave J Woolley (Friday, 18 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Tantek Çelik (Monday, 21 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim (Monday, 21 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jan Roland Eriksson (Monday, 21 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim (Monday, 21 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jan Roland Eriksson (Monday, 21 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Håkon Wium Lie (Monday, 21 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 22 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Håkon Wium Lie (Tuesday, 22 February)
    - "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Håkon Wium Lie (Tuesday, 22 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 22 February)
    - RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jelks Cabaniss (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Chris Wilson (Tuesday, 22 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 22 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Frank Boumphrey (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jelks Cabaniss (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Murray Altheim (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jonny Axelsson (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Dorothée Caulier (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Dave Raggett (Tuesday, 29 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jonny Axelsson (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Braden N. McDaniel (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Walter Ian Kaye (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Chris Wilson (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) JOrendorff@ixl.com (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Walter Ian Kaye (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Chris Wilson (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Murray Altheim (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Nir Dagan (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - pre-XHTML discussions: sprinkles/islands [was: ...] Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: pre-XHTML discussions: sprinkles/islands [was: ...] Arjun Ray (Thursday, 24 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Frank Boumphrey (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Arjun Ray (Thursday, 24 February)
    - RE: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Chris Wilson (Thursday, 24 February)
    - RE: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Arjun Ray (Thursday, 24 February)
    - Re: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Tantek Çelik (Thursday, 24 February)
    - Re: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Arjun Ray (Thursday, 24 February)
    - Re: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Arjun Ray (Thursday, 24 February)
    - Re: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Thursday, 24 February)
    - Re: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Murray Altheim (Thursday, 24 February)
    - RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Chris Wilson (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jan Roland Eriksson (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Chris Wilson (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Murray Altheim (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jonny Axelsson (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Braden N. McDaniel (Thursday, 24 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Monday, 21 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 22 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 22 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jan Roland Eriksson (Tuesday, 22 February)
    - RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) JOrendorff@ixl.com (Monday, 21 February)
    - [www-html] <none> Prince Nokman (Monday, 21 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) L. David Baron (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
    - RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Dave J Woolley (Wednesday, 23 February)
- RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? Dave J Woolley (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Jonny Axelsson (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Friday, 18 February)
  - Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Daniel Hiester (Friday, 18 February)
  - Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Daniel Hiester (Friday, 18 February)
  - Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Murray Altheim (Friday, 18 February)
  - Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Arjun Ray (Saturday, 19 February)
- Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Maury Markowitz (Friday, 18 February)
- RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? Dave J Woolley (Friday, 18 February)
  - Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Daniel Hiester (Saturday, 19 February)
- Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? John Whelan (Friday, 18 February)
question about forms Adrian Walters (Thursday, 17 February)
off-topic regarding off-topics mauricio portasio (Wednesday, 16 February)
Dropdown Menu Trouble John Bergsing (Tuesday, 15 February)
- RE: Dropdown Menu Trouble Grant, John (Tuesday, 15 February)
- Off topic; Re: Dropdown Menu Trouble Nir Dagan (Tuesday, 15 February)
  - Re: Off topic; Re: Dropdown Menu Trouble Francis X. Speiser Jr. (Tuesday, 15 February)
    - Re: Off topic; Re: Dropdown Menu Trouble Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 15 February)
    - Re: Off topic; Re: Dropdown Menu Trouble Francis X. Speiser Jr. (Tuesday, 15 February)
    - Re: Off topic; Re: Dropdown Menu Trouble Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 15 February)
    - Re: Off topic; Re: Dropdown Menu Trouble Nir Dagan (Tuesday, 15 February)
    - Re: Off topic; Re: Dropdown Menu Trouble Jan Roland Eriksson (Wednesday, 16 February)
  - Re: Off topic; Re: Dropdown Menu Trouble Walter Ian Kaye (Wednesday, 16 February)
Scrolling tables without frames Brendan Devers (Tuesday, 15 February)
- RE: Scrolling tables without frames Grant, John (Tuesday, 15 February)
- RE: Scrolling tables without frames Dave J Woolley (Tuesday, 15 February)
  - Re: Scrolling tables without frames Nick Traenkner (Tuesday, 15 February)
FPI case sensitivity in draft-connolly-text-html-02 Gerald Oskoboiny (Monday, 14 February)
- Re: FPI case sensitivity in draft-connolly-text-html-02 Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 15 February)
NAME attribute for IMG pdf@bizfon.com (Monday, 14 February)
- Re: NAME attribute for IMG Dmitry Beransky (Monday, 14 February)
- Re: NAME attribute for IMG Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 14 February)
alt element (was: naming custom/extended tags) JOrendorff@ixl.com (Monday, 14 February)
- RE: alt element (was: naming custom/extended tags) Dave J Woolley (Monday, 14 February)
- RE: alt element (was: naming custom/extended tags) David Wagner (Monday, 14 February)
- Re: alt element (was: naming custom/extended tags) Arjun Ray (Monday, 14 February)
XHTML Basic and XHTML modularization, prologue Jonny Axelsson (Monday, 14 February)
Open File not in HTML format Syahruddin Podding (Monday, 14 February)
New here... Waseem Anis (Monday, 14 February)
French version de ATAG 1.0 Karl Dubost (Sunday, 13 February)
A MUSIC SITE ..... ravikiran@iiit.net (Sunday, 13 February)
naming custom/extended tags Michael Blow (Friday, 11 February)
- RE: naming custom/extended tags JOrendorff@ixl.com (Friday, 11 February)
  - RE: naming custom/extended tags Arjun Ray (Saturday, 12 February)
- Re: naming custom/extended tags Dan Connolly (Saturday, 12 February)
  - Advice and Advocacy (was: naming custom/extended tags) Arjun Ray (Saturday, 12 February)
- RE: naming custom/extended tags JOrendorff@ixl.com (Saturday, 12 February)
  - RE: naming custom/extended tags Arjun Ray (Sunday, 13 February)
Lists in tables pdf@bizfon.com (Friday, 11 February)
- RE: Lists in tables David Wagner (Friday, 11 February)
identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Dan Connolly (Thursday, 10 February)
- Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Arjun Ray (Friday, 11 February)
  - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 15 February)
    - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 16 February)
    - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 16 February)
    - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Terje Bless (Wednesday, 16 February)
    - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 16 February)
    - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI (W3C's motives) Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 16 February)
    - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI (W3C's motives) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 16 February)
    - Suggestions for HTML go where? Maury Markowitz (Wednesday, 16 February)
    - Re: Suggestions for HTML go where? Nir Dagan (Wednesday, 16 February)
    - Ok, here's my suggestion... Maury Markowitz (Thursday, 17 February)
    - Re: Ok, here's my suggestion... Matthew Slocombe (Thursday, 17 February)
    - Re: Ok, here's my suggestion... Daniel Hiester (Thursday, 17 February)
    - RE: Ok, here's my suggestion... Dave J Woolley (Thursday, 17 February)
    - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 16 February)
    - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 16 February)
    - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Murray Altheim (Saturday, 12 February)
    - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Frank Boumphrey (Wednesday, 16 February)
    - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Arjun Ray (Thursday, 17 February)
    - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Dan Connolly (Thursday, 17 February)
    - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Arjun Ray (Thursday, 17 February)
    - review process [was: identify...] Dan Connolly (Thursday, 17 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Murray Altheim (Thursday, 17 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Dan Connolly (Thursday, 17 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Tim Berners-Lee (Thursday, 17 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Murray Altheim (Thursday, 17 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray (Friday, 18 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Murray Altheim (Thursday, 17 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Karl Dubost (Thursday, 17 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Tim Berners-Lee (Friday, 18 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray (Friday, 18 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Dan Connolly (Friday, 18 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray (Friday, 18 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Dan Connolly (Friday, 18 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray (Friday, 18 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray (Friday, 18 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Dan Connolly (Friday, 18 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray (Saturday, 19 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray (Sunday, 20 February)
    - Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray (Sunday, 20 February)
    - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Thursday, 17 February)
    - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Dan Connolly (Thursday, 17 February)
    - Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Thursday, 17 February)
"validate against"??? Dan Connolly (Thursday, 10 February)
- Re: "validate against"??? Arjun Ray (Friday, 11 February)
  - Re: "validate against"??? Dan Connolly (Friday, 11 February)
input type="image" with no borders Hugo Koji Kobayashi (Thursday, 10 February)
- RE: input type="image" with no borders Dave J Woolley (Thursday, 10 February)
  - RE: input type="image" with no borders Hugo Koji Kobayashi (Thursday, 10 February)
- RE: input type="image" with no borders Dave J Woolley (Thursday, 10 February)
Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Jonny Axelsson (Wednesday, 9 February)
- RE: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Dave J Woolley (Wednesday, 9 February)
- Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Nir Dagan (Wednesday, 9 February)
- Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Arjun Ray (Thursday, 10 February)
  - Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Jonny Axelsson (Sunday, 13 February)
    - Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Arjun Ray (Monday, 14 February)
    - Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Jonny Axelsson (Monday, 14 February)
    - Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Arjun Ray (Monday, 14 February)
    - Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Jonny Axelsson (Monday, 14 February)
    - Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Arjun Ray (Monday, 14 February)
    - Re: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Arjun Ray (Monday, 14 February)
- RE: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general rev-bob@gotc.com (Monday, 14 February)
  - RE: Name namespace, namespaces and names in general Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Monday, 14 February)
input tag height Grant, John (Tuesday, 8 February)
- Re: input tag height Peter Rippe (Tuesday, 8 February)
javascript scheme in href URLs Simon St.Laurent (Tuesday, 8 February)
- RE: javascript scheme in href URLs Dave J Woolley (Tuesday, 8 February)
- RE: javascript scheme in href URLs JOrendorff@ixl.com (Tuesday, 8 February)
unused parameter entity Simon St.Laurent (Thursday, 3 February)
Notations are useful Arjun Ray (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: Notations are useful Murray Altheim (Saturday, 5 February)
  - Re: Notations are useful Arjun Ray (Sunday, 6 February)
  - Notations in (x)HTML Arjun Ray (Sunday, 6 February)
  - Some important questions about document profiles and their use Nabil Layaida (Monday, 7 February)
web page M.H.M Hibatullah (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: web page Frank Boumphrey (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: web page Suzanne Topping (Friday, 4 February)
- RE: web page David Wagner (Friday, 4 February)
RE: Netscape and IE images rev-bob@gotc.com (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: Netscape and IE images Daniel Hiester (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: Netscape and IE images Will Wilson (Friday, 4 February)
- RE: Netscape and IE images Dave J Woolley (Friday, 4 February)
- RE: Netscape and IE images Dave J Woolley (Friday, 4 February)
(A) exclusion Jonny Axelsson (Thursday, 3 February)
Re: Netscape and IE images Benjamin Randall (Thursday, 3 February)
missing references Simon St.Laurent (Wednesday, 2 February)
RSAC stupidity? rev-bob@gotc.com (Wednesday, 2 February)
- RE: RSAC stupidity? Dave J Woolley (Wednesday, 2 February)
RE: Table height Dave J Woolley (Wednesday, 2 February)
- Re: Table height Daniel Hiester (Wednesday, 2 February)
RE: XHTML/XML comment Christopher Luebcke (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: XHTML/XML comment Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 1 February)
Re: XHTML/XML comment Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 1 February)
RSAC stupidity (was RE: Process for site development) Walter Ian Kaye (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: RSAC stupidity Walter Ian Kaye (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: RSAC stupidity (was RE: Process for site development) wgzhu@quoininc.com (Tuesday, 1 February)
  - Re: RSAC stupidity (was RE: Process for site development) Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 1 February)
    - Comm 4.7 and XHTML (was Re: RSAC stupidity) Karl Dubost (Tuesday, 1 February)
    - Re: Comm 4.7 and XHTML (was Re: RSAC stupidity) Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 1 February)
- RE: RSAC stupidity (was RE: Process for site development) rev-bob@gotc.com (Tuesday, 1 February)
  - RE: RSAC stupidity Walter Ian Kaye (Wednesday, 2 February)
    - RE: RSAC stupidity rev-bob@gotc.com (Wednesday, 2 February)
- RE: RSAC stupidity (was RE: Process for site development) Dave J Woolley (Wednesday, 2 February)
Re: XHTML/XML comment (case sensitivity an I18N, redux) Dan Oscarsson (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: XHTML/XML comment (case sensitivity an I18N, redux) Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 1 February)
HTML, XML and "Idioms" Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 1 February)

www-html@w3.org from February 2000 by thread