html speech input jmfrenard@free.fr (Tuesday, 29 February)
White Space Scott Violet (Tuesday, 29 February)
Mac user input Jim Culberson (Monday, 28 February)
suggestions... by way of Alan Kotok (Friday, 25 February)
Bidi - HTML vs. CSS Matthew Brealey (Tuesday, 22 February)
Deprecated or not? Bertilo Wennergren (Monday, 21 February)
URL better than FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Friday, 18 February)
CSS3 Jacob Lindborg (Friday, 18 February)
[www-html] <none> David Carlisle (Thursday, 17 February)
HTTP headers Michael Hamm (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Murray Altheim (Saturday, 12 February)
- RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? Piers Williams (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Dan Connolly (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Maury Markowitz (Thursday, 17 February)
- RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? David Wagner (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Tantek Çelik (Thursday, 17 February)
- RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? Jelks Cabaniss (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Sue Sims (Thursday, 17 February)
- RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? John W Pierce (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Murray Altheim (Thursday, 17 February)
- inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss (Friday, 18 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jan Roland Eriksson (Friday, 18 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim (Friday, 18 February)
- RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss (Monday, 21 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim (Monday, 21 February)
- RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss (Monday, 21 February)
- RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 22 February)
- RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss (Wednesday, 23 February)
- RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Sal Candido (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jeffrey (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Sal Candido (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
- RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss (Wednesday, 23 February)
- RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Susan Lesch (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Sal Candido (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Thursday, 24 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Daniel Hiester (Wednesday, 23 February)
- RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Sue Sims (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
- RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss (Wednesday, 23 February)
- RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jonny Axelsson (Monday, 21 February)
RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Dave J Woolley (Friday, 18 February)
Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Tantek Çelik (Monday, 21 February)
Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Håkon Wium Lie (Monday, 21 February)
Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Håkon Wium Lie (Tuesday, 22 February)
"fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Håkon Wium Lie (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 22 February)
RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jelks Cabaniss (Wednesday, 23 February)
RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Chris Wilson (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Frank Boumphrey (Wednesday, 23 February)
RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jelks Cabaniss (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Murray Altheim (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jonny Axelsson (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Dorothée Caulier (Wednesday, 23 February)
RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Dave Raggett (Tuesday, 29 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jonny Axelsson (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Braden N. McDaniel (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Walter Ian Kaye (Wednesday, 23 February)
RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 23 February)
RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Chris Wilson (Wednesday, 23 February)
RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) JOrendorff@ixl.com (Wednesday, 23 February)
RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Walter Ian Kaye (Wednesday, 23 February)
RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Chris Wilson (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Murray Altheim (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Nir Dagan (Wednesday, 23 February)
pre-XHTML discussions: sprinkles/islands [was: ...] Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: pre-XHTML discussions: sprinkles/islands [was: ...] Arjun Ray (Thursday, 24 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Frank Boumphrey (Wednesday, 23 February)
Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Arjun Ray (Thursday, 24 February)
RE: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Chris Wilson (Thursday, 24 February)
RE: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Arjun Ray (Thursday, 24 February)
Re: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Tantek Çelik (Thursday, 24 February)
Re: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Arjun Ray (Thursday, 24 February)
Re: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Arjun Ray (Thursday, 24 February)
Re: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Thursday, 24 February)
Re: Phoney Baloney (was "fighting...") Murray Altheim (Thursday, 24 February)
RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Chris Wilson (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jan Roland Eriksson (Wednesday, 23 February)
RE: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Chris Wilson (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Murray Altheim (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Jonny Axelsson (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: "fighting it out between WGs" (was: inline CSS) Braden N. McDaniel (Thursday, 24 February)
Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Monday, 21 February)
Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Arjun Ray (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Murray Altheim (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jan Roland Eriksson (Tuesday, 22 February)
RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Jelks Cabaniss (Wednesday, 23 February)
RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) JOrendorff@ixl.com (Monday, 21 February)
Re: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) L. David Baron (Wednesday, 23 February)
RE: inline CSS (was: is anyone interested in XHTML?) Dave J Woolley (Wednesday, 23 February)
RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? Dave J Woolley (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Jonny Axelsson (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Friday, 18 February)
Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? Maury Markowitz (Friday, 18 February)
RE: is anyone interested in XHTML? Dave J Woolley (Friday, 18 February)
Re: is anyone interested in XHTML? John Whelan (Friday, 18 February)
New here... Waseem Anis (Monday, 14 February)
A MUSIC SITE ..... ravikiran@iiit.net (Sunday, 13 February)
Lists in tables pdf@bizfon.com (Friday, 11 February)
- Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Arjun Ray (Friday, 11 February)
- Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 15 February)
- Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 16 February)
- Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 16 February)
- Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Terje Bless (Wednesday, 16 February)
- Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 16 February)
- Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI (W3C's motives) Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 16 February)
- Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI (W3C's motives) Arjun Ray (Wednesday, 16 February)
- Suggestions for HTML go where? Maury Markowitz (Wednesday, 16 February)
- Re: Suggestions for HTML go where? Nir Dagan (Wednesday, 16 February)
- Ok, here's my suggestion... Maury Markowitz (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: Ok, here's my suggestion... Matthew Slocombe (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: Ok, here's my suggestion... Daniel Hiester (Thursday, 17 February)
- RE: Ok, here's my suggestion... Dave J Woolley (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Murray Altheim (Saturday, 12 February)
Re: review process [was: identify...] Murray Altheim (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: review process [was: identify...] Karl Dubost (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: review process [was: identify...] Tim Berners-Lee (Friday, 18 February)
Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray (Friday, 18 February)
Re: review process [was: identify...] Dan Connolly (Friday, 18 February)
Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray (Friday, 18 February)
Re: review process [was: identify...] Dan Connolly (Friday, 18 February)
Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray (Friday, 18 February)
Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray (Friday, 18 February)
Re: review process [was: identify...] Dan Connolly (Friday, 18 February)
Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray (Saturday, 19 February)
Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray (Sunday, 20 February)
Re: review process [was: identify...] Arjun Ray (Sunday, 20 February)
Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Dan Connolly (Thursday, 17 February)
Re: identify XHTML DTD by URI, not by FPI Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor (Thursday, 17 February)
input tag height Grant, John (Tuesday, 8 February)
web page M.H.M Hibatullah (Friday, 4 February)
(A) exclusion Jonny Axelsson (Thursday, 3 February)
missing references Simon St.Laurent (Wednesday, 2 February)
RSAC stupidity? rev-bob@gotc.com (Wednesday, 2 February)
RE: Table height Dave J Woolley (Wednesday, 2 February)
Last message date: Tuesday, 29 February 2000 22:26:52 UTC