- From: <JOrendorff@ixl.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:54:38 -0500
- To: www-html@w3.org
> I use the 'idiocy' to provide a standard, simple, here-I-am
> lead-in to the site. I would like to ask (genuine interest, not
> rhetorical smartass), what's wrong with what I do and thus with
> Refresh?
This is a very good question.
The use of splash screens is simple but not "standard"; a lot of users
(myself included) don't expect them and will be slightly bewildered
when they see such a mostly-empty page, and as soon as they recover from
the surprise enough to read the text, *pop* the page disappears.
There are several other almost-convincing reasons to avoid splash pages.
Here is what one user says:
1. No one wants to have to access it every time, so getting to it
really annoys anyone who is not a first time user.
2. But for the first time user, it adds a useless step between them
and whatever brought them to the site in the first place. So it
really annoys them too.
3. Most new users will come via a search engine anyway, so they'll
probably miss the splash page.
4. If you make it the default highest page in the server (eg.
http://www.useit.com/ ) then when people try to find your home
page by chopping off a URL, they get the useless splash page
instead.
5. They ruin the back button.
These comments are attributed to Mike Garrison; you can find them
on the web at Jakob Nielsen's site:
New Top-10 Web Design Mistakes: Reader Comments
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990530_comments.html
--
Jason Orendorff
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2000 18:01:03 UTC