- From: Jacob Lindborg <jacob@albatros.dk>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 14:42:54 +0100
- To: "'Maury Markowitz'" <maury@sympatico.ca>, "'W3C'" <www-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <6412E742BDC7D3118A73009027D5E25605B98A@post1.intern.albatros.dk>
No! The essentail point of these tiny change as you call it, is that this tiny change will take more then to browser generations to be a standard, so that means that it will take more then to years to be a commen standard. This means that we will have another element in the html code, insted of just using the CSS standard as it is... the hole idea of having layout elements in the HTML code is more then irretating. The way I see the future is a webconcept with script, data, and layout in defrient dokuments... we are not talking about a tiny change, but a solution for a bether web development language. Med venlig hilsen/Your sincerely Jacob Lindborg Webdesigner, XML prog. Albatros Network A/S Industriparken 44 2750 Ballerup E-mail: jacob@albatros.dk - (direkte) Tlf.: +45 44 74 76 43 - (direkte nummer) Tlf.: +45 21 43 87 72 - (mobilnummer) Tlf.: +45 44 74 77 60 - (hovednummer) Tlf.: +45 44 74 75 60 - (faxnummer) -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Maury Markowitz [mailto:maury@sympatico.ca] Sendt: Thursday, February 17, 2000 2:20 PM Til: Jacob Lindborg Emne: Re: Ok, here's my suggestion... > I don't think that the introduktion of this tag would do any good. The CSS > standard already support these features It does? I'm looking at my DHTML book now and I don't see anything obvious. > and I think that it would be in everones best interest to keep layout and data > i defrent dokuments, like we are trying to do with XML Well I hate to be the voice in the wilderness, but I think the vast majority of page authors don't really care to do this. This is essentially a *tiny* change that adds value, and just because it's not in tune with this month's flavour of "the way the web should work" doesn't seem like enough justification to not add it. Maury
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2000 08:39:26 UTC