Thursday, 31 May 2018
- Re: [dxwg] vann:usageNote used incorrectly in DCAT RDF representation
- dxwg-ACTION-126: Prepare a proposal for issue 57 about quality information
- dxwg-ACTION-125: Coordinate qualified relations topics
- dxwg-ACTION-124: Assist verification of the URIs in the DCAT-AP profiledesc examples
- dxwg-ACTION-123: Check if Makx is available for the analysis of national DCAT-AP implementations
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- [dxwg] Licenses/rights/obligations on Services
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Profiledesc working
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Profiledesc working
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
Wednesday, 30 May 2018
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Added as section to deal with quality and started some guidance for r…
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Provenance information [RPIF]
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- Re: [dxwg] Extending DCAT for services
- [DCAT] proposed agenda 2018-05-31
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset subsets and size characteristics
- [dxwg] Relate to the Dublin Core Collection Description Application Profile
- Closed: [dxwg] Add mechanism to allow catalogs to be included in a dcat:Catalog
- Re: [dxwg] Add mechanism to allow catalogs to be included in a dcat:Catalog
- Closed: [dxwg] Add mechanism to allow general services to be included in a dcat:Catalog
- Re: [dxwg] Add mechanism to allow general services to be included in a dcat:Catalog
- Closed: [dxwg] Add mechanism for including data distribution services in a DCAT Catalogue
- Re: [dxwg] Add mechanism for including data distribution services in a DCAT Catalogue
- Closed: [dxwg] Fix to DCAT class/property diagram
- Re: [dxwg] Fix to DCAT class/property diagram
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT 1.1 URL in W3C space
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1.1 URL in W3C space
- Re: [dxwg] vann:usageNote used incorrectly in DCAT RDF representation
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Remove one instance of "government"
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- Re: [dxwg] Use Case: Profiles of DCAT-AP and various implementation resources
- Re: [dxwg] Responses can conform to multiple, modular profiles (UC 5.3)
Tuesday, 29 May 2018
- Re: [dxwg] Use Case: Profiles of DCAT-AP and various implementation resources
- dxwg-ACTION-122: Propose initial grouping of the requirements 12-24
- Re: ACTION-119: Remove the labels he proposed for removal (Dataset Exchange Working Group)
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- Re: [dxwg] vann:usageNote used incorrectly in DCAT RDF representation
- Re: [dxwg] vann:usageNote used incorrectly in DCAT RDF representation
- Regrets 29 May Telecon
- Re: [dxwg] vann:usageNote used incorrectly in DCAT RDF representation
- Re: [dxwg] vann:usageNote used incorrectly in DCAT RDF representation
- Re: [dxwg] vann:usageNote used incorrectly in DCAT RDF representation
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - CERIF alignment (profile)
Monday, 28 May 2018
- Re: Analysis of the (national) DCAT,-AP extensions
- Re: [dxwg] Provenance information [RPIF]
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
Sunday, 27 May 2018
- Re: Requirements for Profile Guidance
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- Analysis of the (national) DCAT,-AP extensions
Saturday, 26 May 2018
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles have URI identifiers that resolve to more detailed descriptions (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Provenance information [RPIF]
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset citation [RDSC]
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify scope of DCAT - Datasets, Distributions, Services?
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
Friday, 25 May 2018
- Re: [dxwg] Qualified forms [RQF]
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles have URI identifiers that resolve to more detailed descriptions (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Provenance information [RPIF]
- Re: [dxwg] Provenance information [RPIF]
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset citation [RDSC]
- Re: [dxwg] Example of catalogued service
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify scope of DCAT - Datasets, Distributions, Services?
- Re: [dxwg] PROF - ADMS alignment
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- Re: Documenting ontologies at W3C
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- F2F4 Lyon Oct. 25-26
- Re: Documenting ontologies at W3C
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: Documenting ontologies at W3C
- Re: [dxwg] Quality-related information [RDQIF]
- Re: Documenting ontologies at W3C
- Documenting ontologies at W3C
- [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Extending DCAT for services
Thursday, 24 May 2018
- Re: [dxwg] PROF - ADMS alignment
- Re: [dxwg] PROF - VOAF alignment
- [dxwg] PROF - ADMS alignment
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify scope of DCAT - Datasets, Distributions, Services?
- Re: [dxwg] Example of catalogued service
- Re: [dxwg] Use Case: interoperability between metadata standards describing resources of various types
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset citation [RDSC]
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset citation [RDSC]
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset citation [RDSC]
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset citation [RDSC]
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify scope of DCAT - Datasets, Distributions, Services?
Wednesday, 23 May 2018
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: minutes of conneg meeting
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify scope of DCAT - Datasets, Distributions, Services?
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify scope of DCAT - Datasets, Distributions, Services?
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify scope of DCAT - Datasets, Distributions, Services?
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- [DCAT] dcat team telecon 2018-05-24 - proposed agenda
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Provenance information [RPIF]
- Re: minutes of conneg meeting
- Re: dxwg-ACTION-121: Call for more clarification on candidate uc 239
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: web browser navigation of profile information
- minutes of conneg meeting
- dxwg-ACTION-121: Call for more clarification on candidate uc 239
- Re: [dxwg] Profile negotiation [RPFN]
- Re: Soliciting comment on DCAT FPWD
- Re: Beginning Guidance deliverable
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: web browser navigation of profile information
- Re: [dxwg] New UC for Development and governance of localised DCAT Application Profiles
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: web browser navigation of profile information
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: web browser navigation of profile information
- Re: [dxwg] Proposal for the structure of the "Guidance for Application Profiles" document
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: web browser navigation of profile information
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset citation [RDSC]
- Re: [dxwg] Profile negotiation [RPFN]
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles have URI identifiers that resolve to more detailed descriptions (6.1)
- Re: ACTION-118: Put her text on the wiki (Dataset Exchange Working Group)
- Re: Requirements for Profile Guidance
- Re: [dxwg] Provenance information [RPIF]
- Re: [dxwg] Provenance information [RPIF]
- Re: [dxwg] Qualified forms [RQF]
- Re: [dxwg] Provenance information [RPIF]
Tuesday, 22 May 2018
- Re: [dxwg] Qualified forms [RQF]
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset citation [RDSC]
- Re: [dxwg] Proposal for the structure of the "Guidance for Application Profiles" document
- Re: [dxwg] Proposal for the structure of the "Guidance for Application Profiles" document
- Re: [dxwg] Proposal for the structure of the "Guidance for Application Profiles" document
- Re: ACTION-118: Put her text on the wiki (Dataset Exchange Working Group)
- Re: [dxwg] Proposal for the structure of the "Guidance for Application Profiles" document
- Re: [dxwg] Quality-related information [RDQIF]
- Re: [dxwg] Proposal for the structure of the "Guidance for Application Profiles" document
- Re: [dxwg] Quality-related information [RDQIF]
- Re: [dxwg] Proposal for the structure of the "Guidance for Application Profiles" document
- Re: Requirements for Profile Guidance
- Re: [dxwg] Proposal for the structure of the "Guidance for Application Profiles" document
- Re: Beginning Guidance deliverable
- dxwg-ACTION-120: Add requirements to the europeana use case
- Re: [dxwg] New UC for Development and governance of localised DCAT Application Profiles
- Re: [dxwg] Proposal for the structure of the "Guidance for Application Profiles" document
- Re: [dxwg] Profile negotiation [RPFN]
- dxwg-ACTION-119: Remove the labels he proposed for removal
- Re: [dxwg] Profile negotiation [RPFN]
- dxwg-ACTION-118: Put her text on the wiki
- Re: [dxwg] Quality-related information [RDQIF]
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles have URI identifiers that resolve to more detailed descriptions (6.1)
- Re: Beginning Guidance deliverable
- Re: Soliciting comment on DCAT FPWD
- UCR - my review
- Re: [dxwg] Profile negotiation [RPFN]
- RE: [dxwg] Revision to UC19
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles must support discoverability via search engines (UC 5.40)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles extend or refine (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles must support discoverability via search engines (UC 5.40)
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by kcoyle
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles list expected vocabulary terms for a metadata usage environment (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] Example of catalogued service
Monday, 21 May 2018
- Re: [dxwg] Example of catalogued service
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles list expected vocabulary terms for a metadata usage environment (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles must support discoverability via search engines (UC 5.40)
- Re: [dxwg] Use Case: interoperability between metadata standards describing resources of various types
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to UC19
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to UC19
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to UC19
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to UC19
- Re: [dxwg] Example of catalogued service
- One more conneg(?) requirement
- Re: Requirements for Profile Guidance
- Re: Requirements for Profile Guidance
Sunday, 20 May 2018
- Re: Requirements for Profile Guidance
- Requirements for Content Negotiation
- Requirements for Profile Guidance
- Agenda, May 22
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to UC19
Saturday, 19 May 2018
Friday, 18 May 2018
- Re: [dxwg] Definition of "Schema" (as opposed to profile)
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: web browser navigation of profile information
- Re: [dxwg] Example of catalogued service
- Re: DCAT-rev as First Public Working Draft
- Re: DCAT-rev as First Public Working Draft
- Re: [dxwg] Example of catalogued service
- Re: [dxwg] New UC for Development and governance of localised DCAT Application Profiles
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles should contain constraint information
- Re: [dxwg] Example of catalogued service
- Re: [dxwg] A profile must be packaged as a self-contained artefact
- Re: [dxwg] Example of catalogued service
- Re: [dxwg] Example of catalogued service
- Re: [dxwg] A profile must be packaged as a self-contained artefact
- Re: [dxwg] A profile must be packaged as a self-contained artefact
- Re: [dxwg] Responses can conform to multiple, modular profiles (UC 5.3)
- Re: [dxwg] Example of catalogued service
- Re: [dxwg] Example of catalogued service
Thursday, 17 May 2018
- [dxwg] Use case: web browser-accessible profile information
- Re: [dxwg] Responses can conform to multiple, modular profiles (UC 5.3)
- [dxwg] New UC for Development and governance of localised DCAT Application Profiles
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles listing [RPFL]
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles should provide both machine and human readable views (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles should provide both machine and human readable views (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles should contain constraint information
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles should provide both machine and human readable views (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles extend or refine (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] PROF - VOAF alignment
- Re: [dxwg] Proposal for the structure of the "Guidance for Application Profiles" document
- RE: profiledesc & voaf
- Re: [dxwg] Proposal for the structure of the "Guidance for Application Profiles" document
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles have URI identifiers that resolve to more detailed descriptions (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles have URI identifiers that resolve to more detailed descriptions (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles have URI identifiers that resolve to more detailed descriptions (6.1)
- RE: Organizing GitHub issues, projects and milestones for work on Profiles
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by larsgsvensson
- RE: dxwg-ACTION-117: Find example of catalogued service
- [dxwg] Example of catalogued service
- dxwg-ACTION-117: Find example of catalogued service
- Re: [dxwg] Quality-related information [RDQIF]
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles list expected vocabulary terms for a metadata usage environment (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles have URI identifiers that resolve to more detailed descriptions (6.1)
- Re: Organizing GitHub issues, projects and milestones for work on Profiles
- Re: Organizing GitHub issues, projects and milestones for work on Profiles
- RE: Organizing GitHub issues, projects and milestones for work on Profiles
- Re: [dxwg] Profile negotiation [RPFN]
- RE: Organizing GitHub issues, projects and milestones for work on Profiles
- RE: Organizing GitHub issues, projects and milestones for work on Profiles
- RE: [DCAT] - proposed agenda 2018-05-17 / Apologies
- RE: Soliciting comment on DCAT FPWD
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles have URI identifiers that resolve to more detailed descriptions (6.1)
- Fwd: [DCAT] - proposed agenda 2018-05-17 / Apologies
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles have URI identifiers that resolve to more detailed descriptions (6.1)
- Re: Organizing GitHub issues, projects and milestones for work on Profiles
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles list expected vocabulary terms for a metadata usage environment (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] vann:usageNote used incorrectly in DCAT RDF representation
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Replace vann:usageNote with skos:scopeNote
- Re: [dxwg] PROF - VOAF alignment
- [dxwg] PROF - VOAF alignment
Wednesday, 16 May 2018
- RE: Organizing GitHub issues, projects and milestones for work on Profiles
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles must support discoverability via search engines (UC 5.40)
- Soliciting comment on DCAT FPWD
- RE: Initial notes on profileDesc
- profiledesc & voaf
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles list expected vocabulary terms for a metadata usage environment (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] Proposal for the structure of the "Guidance for Application Profiles" document
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles have URI identifiers that resolve to more detailed descriptions (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles must support discoverability via search engines (UC 5.40)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles list expected vocabulary terms for a metadata usage environment (UC 5.37)
- Re: Organizing GitHub issues, projects and milestones for work on Profiles
- Re: Organizing GitHub issues, projects and milestones for work on Profiles
- Initial notes on profileDesc
- Re: [dxwg] Profile negotiation [RPFN]
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles list expected vocabulary terms for a metadata usage environment (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles must support discoverability via search engines (UC 5.40)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles listing [RPFL]
- Re: [dxwg] Profile negotiation [RPFN]
- [DCAT] - proposed agenda 2018-05-17
- DCAT weekly meeting - May-Oct arrangement
- Canceled: DCAT weekly meeting
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
- DCAT vocabulary meetings
Tuesday, 15 May 2018
- belated apologies
- dxwg-ACTION-116: Draft skeleton messages
- RE: Plenary meetings May 15, 22, 29
- Re: Plenary meetings May 15, 22, 29
- Re: [dxwg] vann:usageNote used incorrectly in DCAT RDF representation
- Re: [dxwg] vann:usageNote used incorrectly in DCAT RDF representation
- Re: [dxwg] vann:usageNote used incorrectly in DCAT RDF representation
- Re: Organizing GitHub issues, projects and milestones for work on Profiles
- RE: Organizing GitHub issues, projects and milestones for work on Profiles
- Re: [dxwg] vann:usageNote used incorrectly in DCAT RDF representation
- Re: [dxwg] vann:usageNote used incorrectly in DCAT RDF representation
- Re: Follow up on DCAT comms/comment strategy (was: dxwg-ACTION-108: Draft a short comms strategy to highlight priorities and mechanisms to drive engagement on FPWD...)
- Re: [dxwg] vann:usageNote used incorrectly in DCAT RDF representation
- Closed: [dxwg] Prepare DCAT document for FPWD
- Re: [dxwg] Prepare DCAT document for FPWD
- Re: [dxwg] Reflect resolution of #172 into ED.
- Re: [dxwg] Refine the config.js
- Re: [dxwg] Fixed ReSpec error
- Re: [dxwg] Added bib refs
- Re: [dxwg] Fix broken links and shortname as requested by W3C
Monday, 14 May 2018
- Re: Follow up on DCAT comms/comment strategy (was: dxwg-ACTION-108: Draft a short comms strategy to highlight priorities and mechanisms to drive engagement on FPWD...)
- Re: Follow up on DCAT comms/comment strategy (was: dxwg-ACTION-108: Draft a short comms strategy to highlight priorities and mechanisms to drive engagement on FPWD...)
- Follow up on DCAT comms/comment strategy (was: dxwg-ACTION-108: Draft a short comms strategy to highlight priorities and mechanisms to drive engagement on FPWD...)
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
Sunday, 13 May 2018
- Re: Beginning Guidance deliverable
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
Friday, 11 May 2018
- RE: Organizing GitHub issues, projects and milestones for work on Profiles
- Re: Organizing GitHub issues, projects and milestones for work on Profiles
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: Beginning Guidance deliverable
- RE: Beginning Guidance deliverable
Thursday, 10 May 2018
- Re: Beginning Guidance deliverable
- RE: ACTION-109: to fix labels (Dataset Exchange Working Group)
- Plenary meetings May 15, 22, 29
- Beginning Guidance deliverable
- Report back from F2F3
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles extend or refine (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles extend or refine (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles extend or refine (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
Wednesday, 9 May 2018
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Cleaned up syntax error and put stub in for resourceRole
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Call for Exclusions: Data Catalog Vocabulary (DCAT) - revised edition
- DCAT-rev as First Public Working Draft
- Link to Industrial Data Space RAD presented in F2F
- dxwg-ACTION-115: Write his blog post
- dxwg-ACTION-114: Send actions and resolutions to mailing list
- Organizing GitHub issues, projects and milestones for work on Profiles
- Re: ACTION-109: to fix labels (Dataset Exchange Working Group)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile vocabulary lists may be defined as closed (no other terms are allowed) or open (other terms are allowed) (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile vocabulary lists may be defined as closed (no other terms are allowed) or open (other terms are allowed) (UC 5.37)
- RE: ACTION-109: to fix labels (Dataset Exchange Working Group)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile vocabulary lists may be defined as closed (no other terms are allowed) or open (other terms are allowed) (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] vann:usageNote used incorrectly in DCAT RDF representation
- Re: [dxwg] Profile vocabulary lists may be defined as closed (no other terms are allowed) or open (other terms are allowed) (UC 5.37)
- [dxwg] vann:usageNote used incorrectly in DCAT RDF representation
- Re: ACTION-109: to fix labels (Dataset Exchange Working Group)
- dxwg-ACTION-113: Work with kcoyle on profile ucs and requirements
- dxwg-ACTION-112: Review profiling use-cases
- Re: [dxwg] Profile vocabulary lists may be defined as closed (no other terms are allowed) or open (other terms are allowed) (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles should provide both machine and human readable views (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Profile vocabulary lists may be defined as closed (no other terms are allowed) or open (other terms are allowed) (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles should contain constraint information
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
- [dxwg] Pull Request: updated examples to match current diagrams. Still needs resource Role…
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Profiledesc working
- Re: [dxwg] Profile vocabulary lists may be defined as closed (no other terms are allowed) or open (other terms are allowed) (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles should contain constraint information
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles should contain constraint information
Tuesday, 8 May 2018
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles should contain constraint information
- Re: [dxwg] Fix broken links and shortname as requested by W3C
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
- Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles should provide both machine and human readable views (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles should contain constraint information
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify any relationship between profiles and validation languages (6.1)
- Closed: [dxwg] Machine-readable specifications of application profiles need to be easily publishable, and optimize re-use of existing specifications (6.8.2)
- Re: [dxwg] Machine-readable specifications of application profiles need to be easily publishable, and optimize re-use of existing specifications (6.8.2)
- Re: [dxwg] Fix broken links and shortname as requested by W3C
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles may inherit clauses from one or more parent profiles, and optimize re-use of existing specifications (6.1)
- Closed: [dxwg] Profiles may inherit clauses from one or more parent profiles, and optimize re-use of existing specifications (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles may inherit clauses from one or more parent profiles, and optimize re-use of existing specifications (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles may inherit clauses from one or more parent profiles (6.1)
- Closed: [dxwg] Profile representation [RPFRP]
- Re: [dxwg] Profile representation [RPFRP]
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix broken links and shortname as requested by W3C
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix broken links and shortname as requested by W3C
- Re: [dxwg] Profile vocabulary lists may be defined as closed (no other terms are allowed) or open (other terms are allowed) (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles must support discoverability via search engines (UC 5.40)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles should provide both machine and human readable views (6.1)
- [dxwg] Profiles should contain constraint information
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify any relationship between profiles and validation languages (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify any relationship between profiles and validation languages (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify any relationship between profiles and validation languages (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles MAY have properties for at least two levels of documentation: 1) short definition 2) input and editing guidance (6.1)
- dxwg-ACTION-111: Find a new wording for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/209
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles should reuse vocabulary terms defined elsewhere
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles may inherit clauses from one or more parent profiles (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] A profile must be packaged as a self-contained artefact
- [dxwg] A profile must be packaged as a self-contained artefact
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles extend or refine (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles list valid vocabulary terms for a metadata usage environment (UC 5.37)
- dxwg-ACTION-110: Find better wording for 216 especially "extend"
- dxwg-ACTION-109: to fix labels
Monday, 7 May 2018
- Re: [dxwg] Definition of "Schema" (as opposed to profile)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles extend or refine (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:accessURL - check constraints
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles extend or refine (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:accessURL - check constraints
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:accessURL - check constraints
- Re: [dxwg] Definition of "Schema" (as opposed to profile)
- Re: [dxwg] Definition of "Schema" (as opposed to profile)
Sunday, 6 May 2018
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles may inherit clauses from one or more parent profiles (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:accessURL - check constraints
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:accessURL - check constraints
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles extend or refine (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles extend or refine (UC 5.37)
Saturday, 5 May 2018
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:accessURL - check constraints
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:accessURL - check constraints
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles extend or refine (UC 5.37)
- Re: DCAT-AP presentation for F2F
- DCAT-AP presentation for F2F
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:accessURL - check constraints
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles may inherit clauses from one or more parent profiles (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:accessURL - check constraints
Friday, 4 May 2018
- RE: Help with broken links in DCAT-rev draft?
- RE: Help with broken links in DCAT-rev draft?
- RE: [dxwg] dcat:accessURL - check constraints
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles extend or refine (UC 5.37)
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:accessURL - check constraints
- Re: Help with broken links in DCAT-rev draft?
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
- Re: [dxwg] Profiledesc working
Thursday, 3 May 2018
- Re: [dxwg] Profiledesc working
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles extend or refine (UC 5.37)
- Re: Help with broken links in DCAT-rev draft?
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles may inherit clauses from one or more parent profiles (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles may inherit clauses from one or more parent profiles (6.1)
- Re: [dxwg] Profiles extend or refine (UC 5.37)
- Re: Help with broken links in DCAT-rev draft?
- RE: Help with broken links in DCAT-rev draft?
- Re: Help with broken links in DCAT-rev draft?
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:accessURL - check constraints
- Re: Help with broken links in DCAT-rev draft?
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Profiledesc working
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:accessURL - check constraints
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
- Help with broken links in DCAT-rev draft?
- Re: [dxwg] dcat:accessURL - check constraints
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify scope of DCAT - Datasets, Distributions, Services?
Wednesday, 2 May 2018
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify scope of DCAT - Datasets, Distributions, Services?
- dxwg-ACTION-108: Draft a short comms strategy to highlight priorities and mechanisms to drive engagement on FPWD
- dxwg-ACTION-107: Contact Dave Raggett and co-ordinate setting up a release
- Re: [dxwg] Clarify scope of DCAT - Datasets, Distributions, Services?
- [DCAT] - Draft documentation of expanded scope
- [dxwg] Replace class .note with .ednote in DCAT draft
Tuesday, 1 May 2018
- [dxwg] DCAT - CERIF alignment (profile)
- dxwg-ACTION-106: Put / arrange all topic around the agenda
- RE: New Member Introduction
- [dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
- Webex call-in for F2F next week
- Re: scope of profile (negotiation) group
- Re: New Member Introduction
- W3C suggests a numbered version
- New Member Introduction
- apologies for tomorrows meeting