W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > May 2018

Re: [dxwg] Proposal for the structure of the "Guidance for Application Profiles" document

From: Lars G. Svensson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 17:35:51 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-389948163-1526578550-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> In the "Definitions" section, it may be worth starting with semantically broadest notion, and then to add the other relevant ones, narrowing down recursively the first definition. Said that, it is still unclear to me whether schema is or not broader than profile etc.

I don't know if it makes sense to say that schema is broader than profile or not. To me they are different things... And I think it's easier to discuss those things if we have some actual content.

> I tentatively used "profile description" for the former (i. e. profile metadata), and "profile definition" for the latter (i. e. (in)formal definition of the profile).

It seems that your "profile desciption" is equivalent to my "profile" and that your "profile definition" is equivalent to my "schema". Does that make sense?

GitHub Notification of comment by larsgsvensson
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/196#issuecomment-389948163 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2018 17:35:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:03 UTC