W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > May 2018

Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document

From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 06:43:34 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-393424874-1527749014-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@agreiner I agree that saying that it only needs a URI is not sufficient for the resource to be a profile. It's like saying that it only needs an http URL to be a web page, but never defining HTML so that web pages can be created.

Early on in this group there was what felt to me to be a consensus that defining a standard schema for a profile was beyond our abilities or time frame. However, the guidance document should provide a strong definition of what makes a "schema" or a "document" a profile. It's the content, just like the content of a PDF can be a curriculum vitae, a doctoral dissertation, a technical report, etc. We have recognizable document types based on their content. To me, a profile has a certain content and particular purposes. That is what we need to cover in the guidance.

As for having a schema, Dublin Core has the [beginnings](http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-dsp/) of this, and I have [started work](https://github.com/kcoyle/RDF-AP) in the Dublin Core area which will hopefully become a work item for that group. It includes a vocabulary for defining simple (i.e. core) profiles. 

GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/242#issuecomment-393424874 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2018 06:43:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:03 UTC