- From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 08:11:36 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
I would lay money on the ISO wording of "recognized body" = ISO and others of that nature. (W3C, NISO, IFLA, etc.) The definition has an air of being self-serving and from ISO's rather narrow view of standards. I don't think that DC is going to adopt that language, but it's under discussion. One possibility for the DC term "conformsTo" is to remove the range "dct:Standard" so that one can state any kind of conformance without running into the question of "is this a standard?". I've made that suggestion to the DC group that is reviewing DC terms. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/214#issuecomment-391976847 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 25 May 2018 08:11:41 UTC