W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > May 2018

Re: [dxwg] A mechanism must be available to identify conformance to each inherited profile given conformance to a profile that specialises it (6.1)

From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 08:11:36 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-391976847-1527235895-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I would lay money on the ISO wording of "recognized body" = ISO and others of that nature. (W3C, NISO, IFLA, etc.) The definition has an air of being self-serving and from ISO's rather narrow view of standards. I don't think that DC is going to adopt that language, but it's under discussion.

One possibility for the DC term "conformsTo" is to remove the range "dct:Standard" so that one can state any kind of conformance without running into the question of "is this a standard?". I've made that suggestion to the DC group that is reviewing DC terms.

GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/214#issuecomment-391976847 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 25 May 2018 08:11:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:03 UTC