W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > May 2018

Re: [dxwg] Proposal for the structure of the "Guidance for Application Profiles" document

From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 20:56:06 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-389662690-1526504165-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
A couple of comments:

1. In the "Definitions" section, it may be worth starting with semantically broadest notion, and then to add the other relevant ones, narrowing down recursively the first definition. Said that, it is still unclear to me whether schema is or not broader than profile etc.

2. About section "Profile description": as I said in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2018May/0144.html , I would suggest using different terms for profile metadata (title, description, etc.) and for the (in)formal definition of the profile (using XML Schema, SHACL, etc. or a simple human-targeted document). I tentatively used "profile description" for the former, and "profile definition" for the latter. Making an analogy with DCAT, the profile description is the dataset, whereas the profile definition(s) correspond to the distribution(s). This is also the pattern used in ADMS - the corresponding classes are `adms:Asset` and `adms:AssetDistribution`, respectively.

GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/196#issuecomment-389662690 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2018 20:56:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:03 UTC