- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 07:45:09 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Back to point 2: @jakubklimek I follow your logic. But in that case the class names are misleading. More strictly they should be `dcat:DatasetDescription` and `dcat:DataServiceDescription`. Now that is probably too much of a mouthful (and the horse has long bolted on `dcat:Dataset`). But perhaps the definitions should be updated to say quite clearly that these are _descriptions_ of the corresponding things. (It also clarifies why `dcat:endPoint` rather than `owl:sameAs`.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/237#issuecomment-390124031 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 18 May 2018 07:45:18 UTC