- From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 17:07:35 +1000
- To: Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Cc: Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 25 May 2018 07:08:28 UTC
Certainly cannot subclass (a Note status of a dependency is incompatible with a Rec arterfact).. note that prof:Profile is a subclass of dcterms:Standard from profileDesc, so these two proposals are mutually compatible. In both cases its a matter of providing guidance that these vocabularies SHOULD be used. This may be a formal profile of DCAT. On 23 May 2018 at 07:34, Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote: > > I am very much in favor of trying Proposal 1. Duplicating DQV in DCAT >> seems quite a counter-productive effort unless there is a strong reason to >> do it - which I do not see! >> > Replying to @aisaac: > Neither do I. I was just provoking to see if others have a different view > on this. > > -- > GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni > Please view or discuss this issue at > https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/57#issuecomment-391148281 using your > GitHub account > >
Received on Friday, 25 May 2018 07:08:28 UTC