W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > May 2018

Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document

From: pedro winstley <pedro.win.stan@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 12:28:06 +0100
Message-ID: <CABUZhH=9ZW1AhA18yiiZgspMrp0R+SSxZM_4St2hZXKUrjS7JA@mail.gmail.com>
To: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Cc: Dataset Exchange Working Group <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Hi @kcoyle and @aisaac
In addition to the DCAT-AP and its various related formulations for
countries and domains, there is other related AP work in the Core Public
Standards Vocabulary AP (
) and adding this into the mix would help diversify the conversation and
provide other illustrations of APs in active use and development

On 30 May 2018 at 07:40, kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote:

> @aisaac I like your suggestion that we treat it as a data model, without
> specifying a particular technology. That could mean that we define concepts
> in the text, and the RDF ontology could be a note showing one
> implementation (I think that implementations can be a note; need to check).
> The bulk, then, of what we provide would be to show the motivation for
> needing a profile description (DCAT-AP and Europeana are great examples).
> Then we have to decide between "should" and "may" but the fact is that we
> have few instances of profiles that use a description to date, so "may"
> might be appropriate for now because we are introducing something new. If
> it is taken up as an actual W3C effort then it could rise to "should"
> level.
> --
> GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
> Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/is
> sues/242#issuecomment-393047637 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2018 11:28:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:03 UTC