Re: [dxwg] profileDesc and the Guidance document

Hi @kcoyle and @aisaac
In addition to the DCAT-AP and its various related formulations for
countries and domains, there is other related AP work in the Core Public
Standards Vocabulary AP (
https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/solutions/core-public-service-vocabulary-application-profile-cpsv-ap_en
) and adding this into the mix would help diversify the conversation and
provide other illustrations of APs in active use and development

On 30 May 2018 at 07:40, kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote:

> @aisaac I like your suggestion that we treat it as a data model, without
> specifying a particular technology. That could mean that we define concepts
> in the text, and the RDF ontology could be a note showing one
> implementation (I think that implementations can be a note; need to check).
> The bulk, then, of what we provide would be to show the motivation for
> needing a profile description (DCAT-AP and Europeana are great examples).
> Then we have to decide between "should" and "may" but the fact is that we
> have few instances of profiles that use a description to date, so "may"
> might be appropriate for now because we are introducing something new. If
> it is taken up as an actual W3C effort then it could rise to "should"
> level.
> --
> GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
> Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/is
> sues/242#issuecomment-393047637 using your GitHub account
>
>