W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > May 2018

Re: Help with broken links in DCAT-rev draft?

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 08:11:52 -0700
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <c184b7ca-b339-6199-3d81-c8cdb6aec0c7@kcoyle.net>
If some URLs are included for historical purposes, perhaps we can use
the archive.org copy as the URL. I've placed those below

On 5/3/18 2:35 AM, Dave Raggett wrote:
> I am preparing the editor’s draft for release as a First Public Working
> Draft. Unfortunately, there are a number of problems with broken links.
> 
> The first problem is the URL for the interval data set from data.gov.uk
> <http://data.gov.uk> now returns 404 not found!
> 
>              http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/interval

https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/interval

> 
> What URL should we use in its place?
> 
> The link checker was unable to connect to both of the following:
> 
>              http://www.deri.ie/

https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.deri.ie/

>              http://vocab.deri.ie/dcat

https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://vocab.deri.ie/dcat

> 
> DERI is now the Insight Centre, so what should we do with these links?  
> 
> The first occurs in reference to Fadi Maali as a previous editor, and
> the next occurs in reference to the original DCAT vocabulary, that was
> developed at the Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI).
> 
> There are also a large number of links with broken fragment identifiers.
> Here are some examples:
> 
>              http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#dataset
>              http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#record
> 
> These reflect a weakness with the link checker in that it checks the
> default resource returned for this URL which is an HTML document with
> links to the ontology in Turtle and RDF/XML.
> 
>              http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Class
>              http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Literal
> 
> Here the link checker gets the Turtle version of the URL, but doesn’t
> know how to process this format.
> 
> I will ask the W3C Webmaster about these and will make the case that the
> link checker isn’t adequate for such links.
> 
> /             /#Class:_Catalog
> /             /#Class:_Dataset
> /             /#example-landing-page
> /             /#Class:_Distribution
> /             /#Class:_Organization.2FPerson
> /             /#Class:_Catalog_record
> /
> /
> These are broken links within the editor’s draft where we are missing
> the corresponding id attributes as the target for these links.  Note
> the “2F” in the penultimate reference, which looks like it is missing a
> preceding “%”.
> 
> Any ideas for how to fix these?
> 
> p.s. we also need to change the latest public version link in the
> editor’s draft to:
> 
>             https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/
> 
> This is respect to the version tracking system now in place for W3C
> reports, see:
> 
>             https://www.w3.org/2005/05/tr-versions
> 
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>>
> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
> W3C Data Activity Lead & W3C champion for the Web of things 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2018 15:12:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 October 2019 00:15:43 UTC