W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > May 2018

Re: [dxwg] Revision to UC19

From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 10:08:24 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-390611923-1526897303-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@agbeltran , my request was actually because this PR was hanging on for more than 1 month with no feedback besides @dr-shorthair 's.

@kcoyle , just for clarity's sake, this is not a new UC, but one contributed during the very first phase of the UC collection. Based on my records, the UC was approved, modulo being revised as per [ACTION-59](https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/59). ACTION-59 also list the relevant emails. As I said in [this email](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2017Nov/0115.html), 

> [...] this use case is a generalisation of other 4 more specific use cases I contributed, covering data lineage [[1](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ID12)], agent roles [[2](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ID13)], data quality [[3](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ID14)], and conformity [[4](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ID16)]. Moreover, UC5.32 [[5](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ID32)], contributed by Alejandra, is also related. [...]

The UC has been revised as agreed, and the revision contributed on [23 Jan 2018](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2018Jan/0079.html). As I didn't receive any feedback, I decided to proceed with a PR to trigger comments (if any).

GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/200#issuecomment-390611923 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 21 May 2018 10:08:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 October 2019 00:15:43 UTC