- From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 09:47:37 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
DCterms is in the process of becoming an ISO standard, and the DC community has on its agenda to look at the differences in how dct:Standard is defined, to whit: DCMI Metadata Terms defines the class "Standard" as follows: A basis for comparison; a reference point against which other things can be evaluated. The draft ISO 15836-2 defines "Standard" as follows: document, established by consensus and approved by a recognized body, that provides, for common and repeated use, rules, guidelines or characteristics for activities or their results, aimed at the achievement of the optimum degree of order in a given context [Source: ISO/IEC Guide 2:1996] If DC adopts the ISO definition, then the definition may or may not be applicable to all profiles. I personally feel that the ISO definition is both over strict and at the same time lacks the key element of community and a commitment to maintenance. But I don't know which way things will go. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/214#issuecomment-391288498 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2018 09:47:44 UTC