W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > May 2018

Re: [dxwg] Revision to UC19

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 16:20:19 +0200
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <c3144129-4503-4bb5-d84b-679521f41a1d@kcoyle.net>
Thanks, Andrea. But the email you respond to there (mine)[1] said:

">My recollection, Andrea, is that most of the group did not understand in
>any level of detail what the Use Case was requiring of DCAT. I suspect
>that if the requirement is to require that DCAT include both unqualified
>and qualified terms, that many will consider that out of scope."


">I would suggest marking these two requirements as currently undecided in
>the FPWD, and we can set aside a time in the near future to clarify this
>with the group and decide what to do with them."

So unless there's a resolution that I've missed (it's tedious going
through them ...) this was something that still needs group discussion
and decision.

[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2017Nov/0115.html

On 5/21/18 12:08 PM, Andrea Perego via GitHub wrote:
> @agbeltran , my request was actually because this PR was hanging on for
> more than 1 month with no feedback besides @dr-shorthair 's.
> @kcoyle , just for clarity's sake, this is not a new UC, but one
> contributed during the very first phase of the UC collection. Based on
> my records, the UC was approved, modulo being revised as per
> [ACTION-59](https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/59). ACTION-59
> also list the relevant emails. As I said in [this
> email](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2017Nov/0115.html),
>> [...] this use case is a generalisation of other 4 more specific use
>> cases I contributed, covering data lineage
>> [[1](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ID12)], agent roles
>> [[2](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ID13)], data quality
>> [[3](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ID14)], and conformity
>> [[4](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ID16)]. Moreover, UC5.32
>> [[5](https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ID32)], contributed by Alejandra,
>> is also related. [...]
> The UC has been revised as agreed, and the revision contributed on [23
> Jan
> 2018](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2018Jan/0079.html).
> As I didn't receive any feedback, I decided to proceed with a PR to
> trigger comments (if any).

Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Monday, 21 May 2018 14:20:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:03 UTC