ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2021 by date

Thursday, 30 September 2021

• DRAFT minutes for the Interim Mark Nottingham
• HTTP Experiments: a bit of housekeeping (moving documents to Historic) Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 29 September 2021

• Re: Working Group Last Call: Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3 Martin Thomson

Tuesday, 28 September 2021

• Working Group Last Call: Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3 Mark Nottingham
• Re: TCP RST code for websockets in h3 Ryan Hamilton
• TCP RST code for websockets in h3 Martin Thomson
• Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-05 Willy Tarreau
• Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-05 Cory Benfield
• Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-05 Julian Reschke
• Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-05 Willy Tarreau
• Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-05 Cory Benfield
• Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-05 Willy Tarreau
• Reminder: interim in ~12 hours Mark Nottingham

Monday, 27 September 2021

• Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-05 Mark Nottingham via Datatracker
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-06.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-05.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Sunday, 26 September 2021

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 24 September 2021

• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-05.txt Lucas Pardue
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-05.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Message Signatures and Cookies Richard Backman, Annabelle
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-04.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Thursday, 23 September 2021

• Re: Significant milestone on HAProxy's H3/QUIC Willy Tarreau
• Re: Significant milestone on HAProxy's H3/QUIC Lucas Pardue
• Significant milestone on HAProxy's H3/QUIC Willy Tarreau

Tuesday, 21 September 2021

• http core spec: late change w.r.t. IANA field registration procedure Julian Reschke
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-01.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Sunday, 19 September 2021

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Thursday, 16 September 2021

• RE: Partial signatures on the Via header Mike Bishop
• Re: Retrying requests sent to Alternative Services Mark Nottingham
• Re: Retrying requests sent to Alternative Services Martin Thomson

Wednesday, 15 September 2021

• Retrying requests sent to Alternative Services Ryan Hamilton
• Re: #1639: One last tweak to proxy-status Amos Jeffries

Tuesday, 14 September 2021

• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Martin Thomson

Monday, 13 September 2021

• #1639: One last tweak to proxy-status Mark Nottingham
• Re: Partial signatures on the Via header Martin Thomson
• Re: Partial signatures on the Via header Justin Richer
• Protocol Action: 'HTTP/1.1' to Internet Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-19.txt) The IESG
• Protocol Action: 'HTTP Caching' to Internet Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-19.txt) The IESG
• Protocol Action: 'HTTP Semantics' to Internet Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-19.txt) The IESG
• Re: Partial signatures on the Via header Lucas Pardue
• Re: Partial signatures on the Via header Martin Thomson

Sunday, 12 September 2021

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-19.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-19.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-19.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Saturday, 11 September 2021

• Re: Partial signatures on the Via header Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Partial signatures on the Via header Amos Jeffries
• RE: Partial signatures on the Via header Eric J Bowman
• RE: Partial signatures on the Via header Justin Richer
• RE: Partial signatures on the Via header Justin Richer
• Re: Digest: Last Call and the next interim meeting Lucas Pardue

Friday, 10 September 2021

• Re: Partial signatures on the Via header Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Partial signatures on the Via header Eric J Bowman
• Partial signatures on the Via header Justin Richer
• Digest: Last Call and the next interim meeting Roberto Polli
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-h3-websockets-00.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Ryan Hamilton
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-hamilton-httpbis-h3-websockets-01 Mark Nottingham
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Greg Wilkins

Thursday, 9 September 2021

• Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-18 Francesca Palombini
• Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-18 Francesca Palombini

Wednesday, 8 September 2021

• Re: Host and :authority (was Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision) Willy Tarreau
• Re: Host and :authority (was Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision) Stefan Eissing
• Re: Host and :authority (was Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision) Willy Tarreau

Tuesday, 7 September 2021

• Re: Host and :authority (was Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision) Greg Wilkins
• Re: Host and :authority (was Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision) Willy Tarreau
• Re: Host and :authority (was Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision) Stefan Eissing
• Re: Host and :authority (was Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision) Greg Wilkins

Monday, 6 September 2021

• Re: Host and :authority (was Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision) Willy Tarreau
• Re: PoW (Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations) Willy Tarreau
• Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-18 Bron Gondwana via Datatracker
• Re: PoW (Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations) Erik Aronesty
• Re: UTF-8 fields (was Re: More on allowed field characters) Cory Benfield
• Host and :authority (was Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision) Martin Thomson

Saturday, 4 September 2021

• Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-18 Marco Tiloca via Datatracker
• Re: PoW (Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations) Stefan Eissing
• Re: PoW (Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations) Willy Tarreau

Friday, 3 September 2021

• Re: PoW (Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations) Paul Vixie
• Re: PoW (Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations) Erik Aronesty
• Re: PoW (Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations) Paul Vixie
• Re: PoW (Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations) Erik Aronesty
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Willy Tarreau
• Re: PoW (Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations) Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile
• Proxy-Status: PR for review Mark Nottingham
• Re: PoW (Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations) Nick Harper

Thursday, 2 September 2021

• Re: PoW (Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations) Erik Aronesty
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-hamilton-httpbis-h3-websockets-01 Eric Kinnear
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-hamilton-httpbis-h3-websockets-01 Ryan Hamilton
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-hamilton-httpbis-h3-websockets-01 Lucas Pardue
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-hamilton-httpbis-h3-websockets-01 Ian Swett
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-hamilton-httpbis-h3-websockets-01 Martin Thomson
• Re: Call for Adoption: draft-hamilton-httpbis-h3-websockets-01 Nick Harper
• Call for Adoption: draft-hamilton-httpbis-h3-websockets-01 Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 1 September 2021

• Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-httpbis-origin-h3-00.txt Lucas Pardue
• Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-httpbis-origin-h3-00.txt Ryan Hamilton
• FW: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-httpbis-origin-h3-00.txt Mike Bishop
• HTTP (httpbis) WG Virtual Meeting: 2021-09-30 IESG Secretary
• HTTP (httpbis) WG Virtual Meeting: 2021-09-28 IESG Secretary
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Willy Tarreau
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Julian Reschke
• httpbis - Not having a session at IETF 112 IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Willy Tarreau
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc7838bis-00.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Tuesday, 31 August 2021

• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: (with COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: New I-D: Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3 Lucas Pardue
• Re: New I-D: Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3 Victor Vasiliev
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Julian Reschke
• Re: New I-D: Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3 David Schinazi

Monday, 30 August 2021

• Protocol Action: 'Building Protocols with HTTP' to Best Current Practice (draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-15.txt) The IESG
• Re: New I-D: Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3 Ryan Hamilton
• Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05 Magnus Westerlund
• Re: UTF-8 fields (was Re: More on allowed field characters) Greg Wilkins
• Re: UTF-8 fields (was Re: More on allowed field characters) Willy Tarreau
• UTF-8 fields (was Re: More on allowed field characters) Martin Thomson
• Re: Binary Messages Martin Thomson
• Re: More on allowed field characters Martin J. Dürst

Sunday, 29 August 2021

• Re: New I-D: Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3 Martin Thomson
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Martin Thomson

Friday, 27 August 2021

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-15.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: New I-D: Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3 Ryan Hamilton
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Julian Reschke
• Re: More on allowed field characters Roy T. Fielding
• Re: New I-D: Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3 Lucas Pardue
• New I-D: Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3 Ryan Hamilton
• Re: More on allowed field characters Stefan Eissing
• Re: More on allowed field characters Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: Binary Messages Julian Reschke
• Re: More on allowed field characters Willy Tarreau
• Re: More on allowed field characters Greg Wilkins
• Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14 Joseph Salowey via Datatracker
• Re: #1605: Targeted CC as a trailer? Mark Nottingham
• Re: #1605: Targeted CC as a trailer? Martin Thomson
• Re: #1605: Targeted CC as a trailer? Mark Nottingham
• #1606: Targeted CC parsing Mark Nottingham
• Re: #1605: Targeted CC as a trailer? Martin Thomson
• #1605: Targeted CC as a trailer? Mark Nottingham
• Re: More on allowed field characters Martin Thomson
• Re: Binary Messages Martin Thomson

Thursday, 26 August 2021

• Re: More on allowed field characters Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Binary Messages Julian Reschke
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Murray Kucherawy's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Murray Kucherawy's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: (with COMMENT) Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
• Re: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: More on allowed field characters Willy Tarreau
• Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with COMMENT) Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
• Re: More on allowed field characters Martin Thomson
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 25 August 2021

• Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
• Re: IETF Last Call for HTTP 'core' documents Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06 Francesca Palombini
• Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with COMMENT) Warren Kumari via Datatracker
• Re: IETF Last Call for HTTP 'core' documents Julian Reschke
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Julian Reschke
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Julian Reschke
• Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: (with COMMENT) Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
• Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with COMMENT) Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: (with COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
• Re: Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06 Mark Nottingham
• Re: Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 24 August 2021

• Re: Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06 Benno Overeinder via Datatracker
• Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with COMMENT) Lars Eggert via Datatracker
• Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Lars Eggert via Datatracker
• Re: Connection-specific fields in HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Re: Connection-specific fields in HTTP/2 Willy Tarreau
• Connection-specific fields in HTTP/2 Martin Thomson
• Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: More on allowed field characters Mark Nottingham
• Re: More on allowed field characters Martin Thomson

Monday, 23 August 2021

• Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: (with COMMENT) Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
• SECOND Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-18.txt> (HTTP Semantics) to Internet Standard The IESG
• Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-18.txt> (HTTP/1.1) to Internet Standard The IESG
• Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-18.txt> (HTTP Caching) to Internet Standard The IESG
• [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7230 (5257) RFC Errata System
• [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7230 (5163) RFC Errata System
• [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7231 (5806) RFC Errata System
• [Errata Rejected] RFC7231 (5300) RFC Errata System
• Re: IETF Last Call for HTTP 'core' documents Julian Reschke
• states as subsesctions, was: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Julian Reschke
• Re: More on allowed field characters Willy Tarreau
• Re: More on allowed field characters Willy Tarreau
• Re: More on allowed field characters Greg Wilkins
• Re: More on allowed field characters Martin Thomson
• Re: More on allowed field characters Willy Tarreau
• Re: More on allowed field characters Martin Thomson
• Re: More on allowed field characters Willy Tarreau
• Re: More on allowed field characters Martin Thomson
• Re: More on allowed field characters Willy Tarreau
• More on allowed field characters Martin Thomson
• Re: H2 draft: could we further refine Host vs :authority ? Martin Thomson
• Re: Erik Kline's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06 Mark Nottingham
• Re: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 22 August 2021

• Erik Kline's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with COMMENT) Erik Kline via Datatracker

Saturday, 21 August 2021

• Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06 Jim Fenton via Datatracker
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Julian Reschke
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Willy Tarreau
• IETF Last Call for HTTP 'core' documents Mark Nottingham
• Re: Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham

Friday, 20 August 2021

• Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: (with COMMENT) Martin Duke via Datatracker
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Julian Reschke
• Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: (with COMMENT) Robert Wilton via Datatracker

Thursday, 19 August 2021

• Re: Subtle incompatibility between H2 and H1's :path Martin Thomson
• Fwd: Subtle incompatibility between H2 and H1's :path Stefan Eissing
• Subtle incompatibility between H2 and H1's :path Willy Tarreau
• Re: Erik Kline's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 18 August 2021

• Erik Kline's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: (with COMMENT) Erik Kline via Datatracker
• Protocol Action: 'The Cache-Status HTTP Response Header Field' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-10.txt) The IESG
• Revised HTTP core specifications submitted (drafts 18) Roy T. Fielding
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-18.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-18.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-18.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• H2 draft: could we further refine Host vs :authority ? Willy Tarreau
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Julian Reschke
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Willy Tarreau
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-10.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09 Martin J. Dürst
• Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09 Mark Nottingham
• Interim meeting -- planning Mark Nottingham
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 17 August 2021

• Re: Martin Duke's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-13: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Martin Thomson
• Martin Duke's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-13: (with COMMENT) Martin Duke via Datatracker
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Willy Tarreau
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Julian Reschke
• Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09 Martin J. Dürst
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Kazuho Oku
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Martin Thomson
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Kazuho Oku
• Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09 Mark Nottingham

Monday, 16 August 2021

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09 Francesca Palombini
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Amos Jeffries
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Kazuho Oku
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Martin Thomson
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Ryan Sleevi

Sunday, 15 August 2021

• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Martin Thomson
• Re: Privacy considerations of trace logging (was Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt) Roberto Peon
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Roberto Peon
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Roberto Peon
• Re: Privacy considerations of trace logging (was Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt) Lucas Pardue
• Re: Privacy considerations of trace logging (was Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt) Kazuho Oku
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Ryan Sleevi
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Kazuho Oku
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Privacy considerations of trace logging (was Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt) Lucas Pardue

Saturday, 14 August 2021

• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Alex Rousskov
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Mark Nottingham
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Jana Iyengar
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Jana Iyengar

Friday, 13 August 2021

• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-13 David Schinazi
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-06.txt Vipada Sangkaew
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-06.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Robin MARX
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-selftrace-00.txt Kazuho Oku
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-13 Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 12 August 2021

• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-13 David Schinazi via Datatracker
• Re: Murray Kucherawy's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09: (with COMMENT) Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Murray Kucherawy's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Murray Kucherawy's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Murray Kucherawy's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09: (with COMMENT) Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
• Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-07.txt> (Service binding and parameter specification via the DNS (DNS SVCB and HTTPS RRs)) to Proposed Standard Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 11 August 2021

• Signature Language Updates Justin Richer
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Binary Messages Martin Thomson

Tuesday, 10 August 2021

• Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09: (with COMMENT) Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
• Re: Ddos prevention for ssl Julian Reschke
• Re: Ddos prevention for ssl Willy Tarreau
• Re: Ddos prevention for ssl Erik Aronesty
• Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09 Martin Dürst via Datatracker
• Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Martin J. Dürst
• Re: Ddos prevention for ssl Willy Tarreau
• Re: PoW (Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations) Erik Nygren
• Re: PoW (Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations) Stephen Farrell
• Re: PoW (Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations) Paul Vixie
• PoW (Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations) Martin Thomson

Monday, 9 August 2021

• Re: Ddos prevention for ssl Paul Vixie
• Extended CONNECT, Capsules in DATA, HTTP Upgrade Tokens David Schinazi
• Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09: (with COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
• Re: Ddos prevention for ssl Erik Aronesty
• Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Eric J Bowman
• Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Eric J Bowman
• Re: Ddos prevention for ssl Willy Tarreau

Sunday, 8 August 2021

• Ddos prevention for ssl Erik Aronesty

Friday, 6 August 2021

• Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Erik Aronesty

Sunday, 8 August 2021

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 7 August 2021

• Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Amos Jeffries

Friday, 6 August 2021

• Signature Negotiation Justin Richer
• Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Willy Tarreau
• RE: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Mike Bishop
• Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Willy Tarreau
• Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Eric J Bowman
• Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Eric J Bowman
• Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Willy Tarreau
• Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Nick Harper
• Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Willy Tarreau
• Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Nick Harper
• Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Willy Tarreau
• Re: Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Toerless Eckert
• Attack research on HTTP/2 implementations Martin Thomson

Thursday, 5 August 2021

• Re: Negotiating Window Limits for Content Encodings Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Negotiating Window Limits for Content Encodings W. Felix Handte
• Re: Negotiating Window Limits for Content Encodings Willy Tarreau
• Re: Negotiating Window Limits for Content Encodings Julian Reschke
• Re: Negotiating Window Limits for Content Encodings Martin Thomson
• Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09: (with COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Negotiating Window Limits for Content Encodings Willy Tarreau
• Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05 Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 4 August 2021

• Negotiating Window Limits for Content Encodings W. Felix Handte
• Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09: (with COMMENT) Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
• Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05 Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-13.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12 Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 3 August 2021

• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12 Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12 Mark Nottingham

Monday, 2 August 2021

• Re: Updating RFC7616 in BCP56bis Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Updating RFC7616 in BCP56bis Julian Reschke
• Updating RFC7616 in BCP56bis Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7804 (6633) Benjamin Kaduk

Sunday, 1 August 2021

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 31 July 2021

• RE: Secdir early review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-05 Justin Richer
• Re: Secdir early review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-05 Mark Nottingham

Friday, 30 July 2021

• Secdir early review of draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-05 Daniel Migault via Datatracker
• Re: message-signatures: Renaming "Content Identifiers" Justin Richer

Thursday, 29 July 2021

• Re: #1207: Signature Negotiation and Want-Signature Justin Richer
• Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05 Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 28 July 2021

• Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05 Thomas Fossati via Datatracker

Tuesday, 27 July 2021

• Re: #1207: Signature Negotiation and Want-Signature squid3@treenet.co.nz
• Re: Revised HTTP core specifications submitted (drafts 17) Willy Tarreau
• Re: message-signatures: Renaming "Content Identifiers" ‪Amos Jeffries‬

Monday, 26 July 2021

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-00.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Revised HTTP core specifications submitted (drafts 17) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12 Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 25 July 2021

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-17.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-17.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-17.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12 Joseph Salowey via Datatracker
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 24 July 2021

• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: message-signatures: Renaming "Content Identifiers" Mark Nottingham

Friday, 23 July 2021

• #1207: Signature Negotiation and Want-Signature Justin Richer
• Re: message-signatures: Renaming "Content Identifiers" Justin Richer
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Willy Tarreau
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Martin Thomson
• Re: Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Willy Tarreau
• Re: #879: Should servers interpret Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 requests? Stefan Eissing
• Re: #879: Should servers interpret Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 requests? Willy Tarreau
• Re: #904: Content on GET requirement strength Willy Tarreau
• Re: #904: Content on GET requirement strength Amos Jeffries
• Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05 Mark Nottingham
• Re: #904: Content on GET requirement strength Mark Nottingham
• Re: #879: Should servers interpret Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 requests? Mark Nottingham
• Re: Call for Adoption: Alt-Svc bis Mark Nottingham
• Working Group Last Call: HTTP/2 revision Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 22 July 2021

• Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05 Rich Salz via Datatracker

Wednesday, 21 July 2021

• Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05.txt> (The Proxy-Status HTTP Response Header Field) to Proposed Standard The IESG
• AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05 Francesca Palombini

Monday, 19 July 2021

• Re: #879: Should servers interpret Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 requests? Willy Tarreau
• Re: #879: Should servers interpret Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 requests? Mark Nottingham
• Re: #879: Should servers interpret Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 requests? Greg Wilkins

Sunday, 18 July 2021

• Re: Prioritizing HTTP DATAGRAMs Lucas Pardue
• Re: #879: Should servers interpret Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 requests? Amos Jeffries
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 17 July 2021

• Re: SEARCH Rafal Pietrak
• SEARCH Julian Reschke
• Re: #904: Content on GET requirement strength Rafal Pietrak
• Re: #904: Content on GET requirement strength Carsten Bormann
• Re: message-signatures: Renaming "Content Identifiers" Mark Nottingham
• Re: UDP source ports for HTTP/3 and QUIC Mark Nottingham

Friday, 16 July 2021

• Re: UDP source ports for HTTP/3 and QUIC Toerless Eckert
• Re: #904: Content on GET requirement strength Asbjørn Ulsberg
• message-signatures: Renaming "Content Identifiers" Richard Backman, Annabelle
• Re: #904: Content on GET requirement strength Willy Tarreau
• Re: #904: Content on GET requirement strength Julian Reschke
• Re: #904: Content on GET requirement strength David Benjamin
• Re: #904: Content on GET requirement strength Carsten Bormann
• RE: #904: Content on GET requirement strength Mike Bishop
• Re: UDP source ports for HTTP/3 and QUIC Stefan Eissing
• Re: UDP source ports for HTTP/3 and QUIC Willy Tarreau
• #904: Content on GET requirement strength Mark Nottingham
• Re: UDP source ports for HTTP/3 and QUIC Poul-Henning Kamp
• Re: UDP source ports for HTTP/3 and QUIC Willy Tarreau
• Re: UDP source ports for HTTP/3 and QUIC Toerless Eckert
• Re: UDP source ports for HTTP/3 and QUIC Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 15 July 2021

• Re: UDP source ports for HTTP/3 and QUIC Erik Nygren
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures, a closer look Justin Richer
• Re: UDP source ports for HTTP/3 and QUIC David Schinazi
• Re: MACs and Signatures (was Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-05) Nikos Fotiou
• Re: UDP source ports for HTTP/3 and QUIC Willy Tarreau
• Re: UDP source ports for HTTP/3 and QUIC Stefan Eissing
• Re: UDP source ports for HTTP/3 and QUIC Willy Tarreau
• UDP source ports for HTTP/3 and QUIC Mark Nottingham
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures, a closer look Martin Thomson

Wednesday, 14 July 2021

• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures, a closer look Nick Harper
• Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures, a closer look Eric J Bowman
• draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures, a closer look Watson Ladd
• Re: MACs and Signatures (was Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-05) Watson Ladd
• Re: MACs and Signatures (was Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-05) Justin Richer
• MACs and Signatures (was Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-05) Watson Ladd
• Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12 Mark Nottingham
• Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12 David Black via Datatracker

Tuesday, 13 July 2021

• RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-05 Justin Richer
• #879: Should servers interpret Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 requests? Mark Nottingham

Monday, 12 July 2021

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2bis-03.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-04.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Sunday, 11 July 2021

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Saturday, 10 July 2021

• Re: HTTP request validation guidelines for implementers Willy Tarreau
• Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12.txt> (Building Protocols with HTTP) to Best Current Practice The IESG

Friday, 9 July 2021

• Re: HTTP request validation guidelines for implementers João Penteado
• AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12 Francesca Palombini
• Re: HTTP request validation guidelines for implementers Julian Reschke
• Re: HTTP request validation guidelines for implementers João Penteado
• Re: HTTP request validation guidelines for implementers Julian Reschke
• Re: HTTP request validation guidelines for implementers Rafal Pietrak
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-09.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-08 Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 8 July 2021

• HTTP request validation guidelines for implementers João Penteado
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Roy T. Fielding
• Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05 Tommy Pauly via Datatracker
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 7 July 2021

• Re: Adoption call for draft-cdn-control-header Tommy Pauly
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Willy Tarreau
• Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-08 Paul Kyzivat
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Julian Reschke
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-08 Mark Nottingham
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk

Tuesday, 6 July 2021

• RE: Call for Adoption: Alt-Svc bis Mike Bishop

Monday, 5 July 2021

• Digest headers: reboot digest-algorithm registry Roberto Polli
• Re: Call for Adoption: Alt-Svc bis Martin Thomson

Sunday, 4 July 2021

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot

Friday, 2 July 2021

• Re: Signature [protocol element] identifiers Justin Richer
• Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-08 Paul Kyzivat
• Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-header-08 Mark Nottingham
• Re: Call for Adoption: Alt-Svc bis Willy Tarreau

Thursday, 1 July 2021

• Re: Call for Adoption: Alt-Svc bis Christopher Wood
• Re: Tying signed responses to signed requests Justin Richer
• Re: Tying signed responses to signed requests Roberto Polli
• Re: Call for Adoption: Alt-Svc bis Daniel Stenberg
• Re: Call for Adoption: Alt-Svc bis Mike Taylor
• Tying signed responses to signed requests Justin Richer
• Re: Call for Adoption: Alt-Svc bis Ian Swett
• Re: Call for Adoption: Alt-Svc bis Lucas Pardue
• Call for Adoption: Alt-Svc bis Mark Nottingham

Last message date: Thursday, 30 September 2021 23:23:50 UTC