- From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 07:34:12 +0000
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <E1m51JR-00044M-6H@mimas.w3.org>
Events without label "editorial"
Issues
------
* httpwg/http-core (+1/-3/💬44)
1 issues created:
- 13. -----A client SHOULD NOT generate content in a GET request. ContentFP: The text could add something for when it is acceptable or expected to make sense (so why this is a SHOULD). (by mnot)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/904
6 issues received 44 new comments:
- #904 Content on GET: requirement strength (25 by MikeBishop, martinthomson, mnot, reschke, wtarreau)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/904 [semantics]
- #895 Mid-stream error semantics? (1 by tigt)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/895
- #879 Should servers interpret Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 requests? (11 by icing, kazuho, mnot, wtarreau)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/879 [h1-messaging]
- #859 Éric Vyncke's COMMENT draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-16 (3 by reschke, royfielding)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/859 [semantics]
- #851 Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-16 (3 by reschke)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/851 [semantics]
- #832 Validation request formation and Vary (1 by mnot)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/832 [caching] [has-proposal]
3 issues closed:
- Validation request formation and Vary https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/832 [caching] [has-proposal]
- Éric Vyncke's COMMENT draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-16 https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/859 [semantics]
- Roman Danyliw COMMENT draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-16 https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/854 [semantics]
* httpwg/http-extensions (+1/-7/💬17)
1 issues created:
- priority: prefer s/MAY/can/ for what extensions could do (by LPardue)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1571
11 issues received 17 new comments:
- #1568 AD review for bcp56bis (3 by mnot)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1568 [bcp56bis]
- #1564 AD review for cache-status (5 by fpalombini, mnot)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1564 [cache-header]
- #1554 [SIGNATURES] Clarify Host vs :authority in canonicalization (1 by jricher)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1554 [signatures]
- #1550 How are DATAGRAM frames prioritized? (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1550 [priorities]
- #1536 @request-target doesn't encode the request target (1 by jricher)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1536 [signatures]
- #1533 Registration policy for digest algorithm values (1 by ioggstream)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1533 [digest-headers]
- #1530 Fix or replace table for request-target (1 by jricher)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1530 [signatures]
- #1196 Support expected authority changes (1 by jricher)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1196 [signatures]
- #1195 Define more content identifiers (1 by jricher)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1195 [signatures]
- #1189 Reconcile Date header and Creation Time (1 by jricher)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1189 [signatures]
- #1180 No percent-encoding normalization of path/query (1 by jricher)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1180 [signatures]
7 issues closed:
- Define more content identifiers https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1195 [signatures]
- No percent-encoding normalization of path/query https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1180 [signatures]
- Fix or replace table for request-target https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1530 [signatures]
- [SIGNATURES] Clarify Host vs :authority in canonicalization https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1554 [signatures]
- @request-target doesn't encode the request target https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1536 [signatures]
- AD review for cache-status https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1564 [cache-header]
- The priority extension doesn't mention the CONNECT method https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1495 [priorities]
* httpwg/http2-spec (+0/-1/💬0)
1 issues closed:
- Target URIs https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/issues/867
Pull requests
-------------
* httpwg/http-core (+4/-3/💬9)
4 pull requests submitted:
- clarify that Accept-Ranges can be sent by any server (by royfielding)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/902 [semantics]
- (editorial) Instead of potential transition, describe why servers accept absolute-form (by royfielding)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/901 [h1-messaging]
- (editorial) tweaks inspired by kaduk suggestions from IESG review (by royfielding)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/900
- forked suggestions by kaduk with further edits (by royfielding)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/899 [semantics]
4 pull requests received 9 new comments:
- #902 clarify that Accept-Ranges can be sent by any server (4 by mnot, reschke, royfielding)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/902 [semantics]
- #882 Accept-Ranges is for Origin Servers (3 by reschke, royfielding)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/882
- #874 Editorial suggestions from Benjamin Kaduk's IESG review (cache) (1 by royfielding)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/874
- #870 Editorial suggestions from Benjamin Kaduk's IESG review (-semantics) (1 by royfielding)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/870
3 pull requests merged:
- clarify that Accept-Ranges can be sent by any server
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/902 [semantics]
- Editorial suggestions from Benjamin Kaduk's IESG review (-messaging)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/872
- Roman Danyliw COMMENT draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-16 (for #854)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/855 [semantics]
* httpwg/http-extensions (+1/-5/💬3)
1 pull requests submitted:
- priority: changelog 04 (by LPardue)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1570
2 pull requests received 3 new comments:
- #1565 added new specialty content fields, fix request-target (2 by jricher)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1565 [signatures]
- #1544 priorities: CONNECT can be prioritized too (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1544 [priorities]
5 pull requests merged:
- Add request/response binding
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1566 [signatures]
- added new specialty content fields, fix request-target
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1565 [signatures]
- Fix: #1377. Reboot digest-algorithm values registry.
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1567 [digest-headers]
- priority: changelog 04
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1570
- priorities: CONNECT can be prioritized too
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1544 [priorities]
* httpwg/http2-spec (+2/-3/💬1)
2 pull requests submitted:
- HTTP work (by mnot)
https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/874
- A simple, but manual, s/bit \d/the XXX Flag/ (by martinthomson)
https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/873
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #874 HTTP work (1 by mnot)
https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/874
3 pull requests merged:
- HTTP work
https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/874
- A simple, but manual, s/bit \d/the XXX Flag/
https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/873
- Change log for character validation
https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/872
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/httpwg/http-core
* https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions
* https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec
Received on Sunday, 18 July 2021 07:34:12 UTC