W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2021

Re: New I-D: Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3

From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 17:25:11 +0100
Message-ID: <CALGR9oY-j3NxupwHrwQoKq=yy3HviyMmbKyXA2xghhE+2uZQ6g@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 1:32 AM David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> (speaking solely as a QUIC/MASQUE/WebTransport enthusiast)
>
> I agree with MT here. WebTransport is currently relying on Extended
> CONNECT, and MASQUE is going to soon (assuming the MASQUE WG reaches
> consensus on that, but everyone seemed to agree last time we discussed it -
> I've been planning on writing PRs for CONNECT-UDP and CONNECT-IP but I got
> distracted with other things). Over in WebTransport and MASQUE we had
> somewhat forgotten about the fact that HTTP/2 SETTINGS need to be redefined
> for HTTP/3, but that was an oversight. So I'm in favor of progressing
> draft-hamilton-httpbis-h3-websockets as both WebTransport and MASQUE will
> likely have a dependency on it. The sooner we get this in the pipeline, the
> better.
>

+1

On the whole, I think this draft is the right way to go for WebSockets and
any other drafts that might also want to use extended CONNECT.
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2021 16:25:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 31 August 2021 16:25:38 UTC