Re: New I-D: Bootstrapping WebSockets with HTTP/3

On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 1:32 AM David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> (speaking solely as a QUIC/MASQUE/WebTransport enthusiast)
>
> I agree with MT here. WebTransport is currently relying on Extended
> CONNECT, and MASQUE is going to soon (assuming the MASQUE WG reaches
> consensus on that, but everyone seemed to agree last time we discussed it -
> I've been planning on writing PRs for CONNECT-UDP and CONNECT-IP but I got
> distracted with other things). Over in WebTransport and MASQUE we had
> somewhat forgotten about the fact that HTTP/2 SETTINGS need to be redefined
> for HTTP/3, but that was an oversight. So I'm in favor of progressing
> draft-hamilton-httpbis-h3-websockets as both WebTransport and MASQUE will
> likely have a dependency on it. The sooner we get this in the pipeline, the
> better.
>

+1

On the whole, I think this draft is the right way to go for WebSockets and
any other drafts that might also want to use extended CONNECT.