- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:15:59 +1000
- To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
- Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Hi Erik, Thanks for the feedback. See responses in: https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1609 Cheers, > On 19 Aug 2021, at 7:13 am, Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > > Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-14: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [S4.3, comment] > > * Are all the uses of "should" here deliberately lowercase? I got > the feeling some of them could well have been SHOULD, e.g., > "Applications using HTTP SHOULD specify that ... when HTTPS is used." > > [S4.5.1, nit] > > * s/ought consider/ought to consider/, I suspect > > [S4.5.2, question] > > * Is it correct to say "OPTIONS is not the default GET method"? > Should that be something like "not the default HTTP method"? > > [S4.10, question] > > * Might "ambient authority" benefit from a reference to RFC 6454 > section 8.3? > > [S4.13, nit] > > * "can execute script" -> "a script" or "scripts"? > > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2021 02:16:21 UTC