- From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 22:43:58 +0000
- To: "Erik Aronesty" <erik@q32.com>
- Cc: "Nick Harper" <ietf@nharper.org>, "Erik Nygren" <erik@nygren.org>, "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Fri Sep 3, 2021 at 3:53 PM UTC, Erik Aronesty wrote: > a flexible, intelligent protocol could make it infeasible for an > attacker to bring down a server, while allowing regular traffic to > proceed virtually unhindered i think you should google for "low orbit ion cannon" before you decide. > but i'm arguing with people who have conflicts of interest, so i'm done. i want to avoid non-beneficial complexity, but that i have no pecuniary interests in whether such complexity is present in HTTP or not. but, perhaps you are lumping me in without warrant. vixie
Received on Friday, 3 September 2021 22:44:13 UTC