- From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 23:35:35 -0700
- To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
- Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status@ietf.org, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, tpauly@apple.com
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Nice work, as usual for this WG. Question 7 (an important one) in the shepherd writeup has not been properly answered. I had the same thought as Warren about seeing an example of multiple proxies being indicated, which in turn might report details. I think I saw that there's a proposal for one to be included, so I'll go check that out. Section 2: * "... or when the request contains a header that activates a debugging mode." -- should that be "header field"?
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2021 06:35:48 UTC