Re: Martin Duke's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-13: (with COMMENT) from Mark Nottingham on 2021-08-17 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2021)

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:19:48 +1000
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis@ietf.org, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Message-Id: <AC1DDDAD-3256-44ED-84C2-E98DA78F94DC@mnot.net>

Hi Martin,

> On 18 Aug 2021, at 7:45 am, Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for this update. One tiny comment, to which I don't need a response:
> 
> The discussion about links in Sec 3.2 could use a reference to RFC 8288.

Already addressed from other feedback.

Thanks,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Tuesday, 17 August 2021 23:20:12 UTC