xml-dist-app@w3.org from September 2001 by thread

RE: Issue 4 Proposed Resolution (was: why no doc type declarati on and PIs in SOAP) Champion, Mike (Sunday, 30 September)

Issue 4 Proposed Resolution (was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP) Marc Hadley (Friday, 28 September)

Issue #12 proposed resolution christopher ferris (Friday, 28 September)

Netscape 4.76 - Sun Curtis Alphin (Friday, 28 September)

F2f minutes Yves Lafon (Friday, 28 September)

SOAP Versioning Martin Gudgin (Tuesday, 25 September)

SOAP Versioning Martin Gudgin (Monday, 24 September)

Header/Details Considered Harmful Jones, Matthew (Monday, 24 September)

About Chinese version of SOAP 1.2 Draft Fennivel Chai (Monday, 24 September)

RE: Can SOAP be called a XML protocol ? [was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP?] Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Friday, 21 September)

RE: Can SOAP be called a XML protocol ? [was: why no doc type dec laration and PIs in SOAP?] Champion, Mike (Friday, 21 September)

why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? Jacek Kopecky (Thursday, 20 September)

[xml-dist-app] <none> cboonchin@yahoo.com (Thursday, 20 September)

Issues with SOAP 1.2 part 1 Editors Draft Williams, Stuart (Thursday, 20 September)

Minutes of the 5 September 2001 teleconference Hugo Haas (Wednesday, 19 September)

SOAP Application christopher ferris (Wednesday, 19 September)

Proposal for Issues 11/13 Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 19 September)

RE: [xml-dev] Pakistan has an English-language weblog Bullard, Claude L (Len) (Monday, 17 September)

issue 95 resolution christopher ferris (Monday, 17 September)

text/xml for SOAP is incorrect mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp (Monday, 17 September)

Pakistan has an English-language weblog Dave Winer (Sunday, 16 September)

Questions about the SOAP 2.1 draft Jones, Matthew (Friday, 14 September)

XML Core response to XMLP request on xml:base in SOAP David Orchard (Wednesday, 12 September)

RE: discarding incorrect namespaces Williams, Stuart (Wednesday, 12 September)

I-D on HTTP resource state model Mark Baker (Wednesday, 12 September)

new issue on Processing SOAP Messages Mark Jones (Tuesday, 11 September)

RE: XML Protocol WG requests comments by XML Core WG on position on XML Base Jonathan Marsh (Tuesday, 11 September)

Re: encodings in RPC Jacek Kopecky (Tuesday, 11 September)

I hava question... 이선헌 (Monday, 10 September)

Presence of the detail element in a SOAP Fault indicating processing of the SOAP Body Hugo Haas (Monday, 10 September)

Re: discarding incorrect namespaces Hugo Haas (Monday, 10 September)

Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard Larry Masinter (Sunday, 9 September)

Re: XML Protocol WG requests comments by XML Core WG on position on XML Base Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com (Sunday, 9 September)

XML Protocol WG requests comments by XML Core WG on position on XML Base David Orchard (Friday, 7 September)

Minutes of the 29 August 2001 teleconference Hugo Haas (Thursday, 6 September)

Sun and independent developers Dave Winer (Thursday, 6 September)

Issue 19 closed Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Thursday, 6 September)

Encoding XML in URIs Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 5 September)

RE: Proposed text for XMLBase Champion, Mike (Wednesday, 5 September)

XML Protocol WG response to XML Schema base64 questions Martin Gudgin (Wednesday, 5 September)

RE: SOAPAction Proposal Williams, Stuart (Tuesday, 4 September)

Re: SOAPAction Proposal Doug Davis (Tuesday, 4 September)

Ordering of Processing [was: Regrets / Issue 71] Mark Nottingham (Monday, 3 September)

RE: Issue 71: Additional actors Mark Jones (Monday, 3 September)

Re: Proposed text for closure of issue 45 Marc Hadley (Monday, 3 September)

sparse arrays - too complex? Alan Kent (Monday, 3 September)

Re: Issue 71: Additional actors Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 1 September)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 September 2001 23:49:04 UTC