- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:38:55 -0400
- To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "Rich Salz" <rsalz@zolera.com>, <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Mark - could you propose some clarifying text?
-Dug
"Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>@w3.org on 09/05/2001
03:27:12 PM
Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
cc: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@zolera.com>, <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, Doug
Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Subject: RE: SOAPAction Proposal
Sounds great!
>Some implementations automagically generate and/or require it,
>IIRC. Stuart's question is framed very nicely; the optionality
>should be the service provider's/service consumer's, not the
>particular stack implementation's. Perhaps if we target
>(groan) the 'optional', this would be resolved to everyone's
>satisfaction?
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2001 15:39:11 UTC