W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2001

RE: SOAPAction Proposal

From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:38:55 -0400
To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, "Rich Salz" <rsalz@zolera.com>, <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF3655B660.09483CE5-ON85256ABE.006BFBB1@raleigh.ibm.com >
Mark - could you propose some clarifying text?
-Dug


"Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>@w3.org on 09/05/2001
03:27:12 PM

Sent by:  xml-dist-app-request@w3.org


To:   "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
cc:   "Rich Salz" <rsalz@zolera.com>, <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, Doug
      Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Subject:  RE: SOAPAction Proposal




Sounds great!

>Some implementations automagically generate and/or require it,
>IIRC. Stuart's question is framed very nicely; the optionality
>should be the service provider's/service consumer's, not the
>particular stack implementation's. Perhaps if we target
>(groan) the 'optional', this would be resolved to everyone's
>satisfaction?
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2001 15:39:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:03 GMT