Sounds great! >Some implementations automagically generate and/or require it, >IIRC. Stuart's question is framed very nicely; the optionality >should be the service provider's/service consumer's, not the >particular stack implementation's. Perhaps if we target >(groan) the 'optional', this would be resolved to everyone's >satisfaction?Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2001 15:28:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 12 October 2006 00:08:42 GMT