W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2001

RE: Can SOAP be called a XML protocol ? [was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP?]

From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 11:38:55 -0700
Message-ID: <C3729BBB6099B344834634EC67DE4AE1025400A1@red-msg-01.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

I agree with Eric van der Vlist's mail.  Subsetting XML for SOAP starts
on a slippery slope to having multiple, incompatible dialects of XML. If
a profile of XML is thought needed for certain classes of device, then
this should be explicitly addressed as an XML issue, not a SOAP issue.

Received on Friday, 21 September 2001 14:39:30 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Champion, Mike: "RE: Can SOAP be called a XML protocol ? [was: why no doc type dec laration and PIs in SOAP?]"
Previous message: Eric van der Vlist: "Can SOAP be called a XML protocol ? [was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP?]"
Maybe in reply to: Eric van der Vlist: "Can SOAP be called a XML protocol ? [was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP?]"
Next in thread: Champion, Mike: "RE: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:03 GMT