W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2001

Re: discarding incorrect namespaces

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:49:04 -0700
To: XML Distributed Applications List <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20010910154859.B7244@mnot.net>


I don't remember it either; I based my comments on the pre-split
Working Draft. 

On the face of it, this looks better, except it still says 'It MUST
discard messages that have incorrect namespace information' which
conflicts with the envelope versioning Fault, IIRC.


On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 02:25:07PM -0700, Hugo Haas wrote:
> Hi Mark.
> 
> I was rereading the spec and noticed that this had been changed.
> 
> * Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> [2001-08-17 14:14-0700]
> > Finally, considering our versioning model, does it make sense to
> > upgrade
> > 
> > "A SOAP application SHOULD include the proper SOAP namespace on all
> > elements and attributes defined by SOAP in messages that it
> > generates."
> > 
> > to MUST, and strike
> > 
> > "... MAY process SOAP messages without SOAP namespaces as though they had
> > the correct SOAP namespaces."
> > 
> > This is in the context of all SOAP namespaces, not just the envelope,
> > but it seems prudent to clarify in some fashion.
> 
> Section 3 now reads[1]:
> 
>    A SOAP node MUST ensure that all element information items and
>    attribute information items in messages that it generates are
>    correctly namespace qualified.
> 
> Is that something we agreed on? I don't remember discussing this. I
> like this change, but I would like to check that everybody is aware of
> and happy with it. That would resolve issue 135[2].
> 
>   1. http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/08/29/soap12-part1.html#reltoxml
>   2. http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x135
> -- 
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - tel:+1-617-452-2092
> 

-- 
Mark Nottingham
http://www.mnot.net/
 
Received on Monday, 10 September 2001 18:49:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:03 GMT