Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP?

+1

Jacek Kopecky wrote:

>  Chris,
>  if we say that "receivers SHOULD ignore and MAY generate a
> fault", IMHO we should also say that "a SOAP message SHOULD NOT
> have a DTD or PIs". This would put the same strength of
> expressions on both sides of the story.
>  I'd +1 this. 8-)
>
>                             Jacek Kopecky