www-webont-wg@w3.org from March 2002 by author

Bill Andersen

• Re: SUO: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? (Friday, 29 March)

Brian McBride

• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. (Wednesday, 20 March)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? (Sunday, 31 March)

Dan Brickley

• comments on OWL-lite: meaning of 'required' values (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (Tuesday, 26 March)
• RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) 2002-03-25 (fwd) (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: WOWG: first language proposal (Tuesday, 19 March)

Dan Connolly

• Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: LANG: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter? (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem (Thursday, 28 March)
• TEST/SEM: sem-intersection test (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: SEM, LANG: initial decision tree doc (Thursday, 28 March)
• Amsterdam ftf agenda in progress (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: minutes: March 21 WebOnt, for review (Thursday, 21 March)
• minutes: March 21 WebOnt, for review (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: WOWG: first language proposal (shared copyright) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: LANG: frame paradigm (Thursday, 14 March)
• TEST: sameGuy: pls report results from software you develop/use (Thursday, 7 March)
• TEST: maybe if/then is clearer than consistency? (more on sameGuy) (Thursday, 7 March)
• RE: LANG: first sketch (Thursday, 7 March)
• an owl use/test case: sameGuy thru UnambigousProperty (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Wednesday, 6 March)
• requirements document publication in progress (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: ISSUES: First draft of open issues document. (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: ISSUES: First draft of open issues document. (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: how to proceed with building OWL [was Re: semantics: layering ...] (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: subgroup telecons? (Monday, 4 March)

David Trastour

• ADMIN: Regrets for 28 March Telecon (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: Next steps (Action: all) (Friday, 1 March)

Deborah McGuinness

• Re: WOWG: first language proposal (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: GUIDE: examples (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: TEST draft message (Thursday, 7 March)
• http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/projects/dql/ (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: DAML query language (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: Next steps (Action: all) (Friday, 1 March)

dieter fensel

• re: AGENDA: pre-agenda for 3/21 telecon (Thursday, 21 March)
• I would like to participate in language features (Monday, 4 March)

Enrico Motta

• Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: LANG: feedback on owl proposal (Sunday, 24 March)
• LANG: feedback on owl proposal (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: LANG: first sketch (Thursday, 14 March)

Evan Wallace

• Re: WOWG: first language proposal (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Requirements Document -was- Re: GUIDE: examples (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: ADMIN: updated agenda Mar 7 (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: ADMIN: Minutes of teleconf 28 Feb '02 (for review) (Monday, 4 March)

Frank van Harmelen

• Re: WOWG: first language proposal (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax (Tuesday, 26 March)
• LANG: UML as reference point (was: LANG: frame paradigm) (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: comments on OWL-lite: meaning of 'required' values (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: LANG: feedback on owl proposal (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: WOWG: first language proposal (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: WOWG: first language proposal (Tuesday, 19 March)
• WOWG: first language proposal (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: GUIDE: examples (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: LANG: frame paradigm (Sunday, 10 March)
• Re: LANG: collect idiom for inclusion in the language (Sunday, 10 March)
• Re: LANG: frame paradigm (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: LANG: collect idiom for inclusion in the language (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: LANG: first sketch (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: LANG: first sketch (Thursday, 7 March)
• LANG: first sketch (Thursday, 7 March)
• ADMIN: updates to 28 Feb minutes (Wednesday, 6 March)
• ADMIN: Minutes of teleconf 28 Feb '02 (for review) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: Next steps (Action: all) (Friday, 1 March)

Guus Schreiber

• Re: LANG: UML as reference point (was: LANG: frame paradigm) (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: WOWG: first language proposal (Thursday, 28 March)
• AGENDA: A'dam ftf (draft) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• AGENDA: telecon Mar 28 (Wednesday, 27 March)
• ALL: WG schedule (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: LANG: UML as reference point (was: LANG: frame paradigm) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: LANG: UML as reference point (was: LANG: frame paradigm) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• LANG: classes as instances (Thursday, 21 March)
• MISC: side event of A'dam ftf (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: LANG: frame paradigm (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: ADMIN: Minutes from Teleconf, 14 Mar 2002 (Review) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: LANG: frame paradigm (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: Requirements Document -was- Re: GUIDE: examples (Thursday, 14 March)
• ADMIN: agenda/logistics Mar 14 (Wednesday, 13 March)
• GUIDE: examples (Tuesday, 12 March)
• ADMIN: updated agenda Mar 7 (Thursday, 7 March)
• ADMIN: agenda/logistics Mar 7 (Wednesday, 6 March)

herman.ter.horst@philips.com

• Re: Requirements document (Wednesday, 6 March)

Hugo Haas

• WSCL "well-formerdness" concept (Wednesday, 20 March)

Ian Horrocks

• RE: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (Saturday, 23 March)
• Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: TEST: sameGuy: pls report results from software you develop/use (Saturday, 9 March)
• Re: TEST: maybe if/then is clearer than consistency? (more on sameGuy) (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: DAML query language (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: LANG: first sketch (Thursday, 7 March)
• RE: LANG: first sketch (Thursday, 7 March)

Jeff Heflin

• Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter? (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: LANG: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter? (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem (Friday, 29 March)
• LANG: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter? (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: WOWG: first language proposal (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: WOWG: first language proposal (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: WOWG: first language proposal (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem (Tuesday, 26 March)
• LANG: A proposal for the layering problem (Friday, 22 March)
• Good news! (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: ADMIN: Minutes of teleconf 28 Feb '02 (for review) (Monday, 4 March)
• REQDOC: Title change? (Monday, 4 March)

Jeremy Carroll

• RE: minutes: March 21 WebOnt, for review (Friday, 22 March)
• LANG: OWL Light and triples (Friday, 22 March)
• RE: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (Friday, 22 March)
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. (Wednesday, 20 March)
• RE: WOWG: first language proposal (Tuesday, 19 March)
• RE: WOWG: first language proposal (Tuesday, 19 March)
• RE: Moving forward (Tuesday, 19 March)
• RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox (Saturday, 16 March)
• RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox (Saturday, 16 March)
• RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox (Saturday, 16 March)
• SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox (Friday, 15 March)
• TEST categorize test suites (Wednesday, 13 March)
• RE: LANG: first sketch & TEST abstract syntax (Friday, 8 March)
• WOWG: input for telecon on test cases (Thursday, 7 March)
• TEST draft message (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: SEM: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it (Tuesday, 5 March)
• RE: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Tuesday, 5 March)
• TEST: first deliverables (Tuesday, 5 March)
• RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it (Tuesday, 5 March)
• subgroup telecons? (Monday, 4 March)
• RE: WOWG: Consensus, subgroups, and e-mail tags (Friday, 1 March)
• TEST: RE: Next steps (Action: all) (Friday, 1 March)
• TEST: first steps (Friday, 1 March)
• WOWG: Consensus, subgroups, and e-mail tags (Friday, 1 March)

Jim Hendler

• Re: LANG: UML as reference point (was: LANG: frame paradigm) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• ADMIN: Face to Face Agenda Update (final agenda Delayed) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• WOWG: IMPORTANT - name issue (Sunday, 24 March)
• LANG/GUIDE: XML.com article on DAML [sic] (Friday, 22 March)
• GUIDE: Re: WSCL "well-formerdness" concept (Thursday, 21 March)
• AGENDA: Agenda/Logistics March 21 (please ignore previous) (Thursday, 21 March)
• [www-webont-wg] <none> (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: WOWG: first language proposal (Wednesday, 20 March)
• AGENDA: pre-agenda for 3/21 telecon (Wednesday, 20 March)
• RE: LANG: first sketch (Tuesday, 12 March)
• ADMIN: current focus group primaries (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Wednesday, 6 March)
• WOWG: Charter issues (was RE: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Wednesday, 6 March)
• SEM: GUIDE: Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Tuesday, 5 March)
• SEM: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Focus are summary (Tuesday, 5 March)
• ADMIN: Sign Up Please (Sunday, 3 March)
• JOKE: RE: WOWG: Consensus, subgroups, and e-mail tags (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: how to proceed with building OWL [was Re: semantics: layering ...] (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: how to proceed with building OWL [was Re: semantics: layering ...] (Friday, 1 March)

Jonathan Borden

• LANG: pushing daml:collection was: Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter? (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter? (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem (Tuesday, 26 March)
• RDF vs. OWL interpretations (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: LANG: ONX round 2 was Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax (Sunday, 24 March)
• LANG: ONX round 2 was Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax (Sunday, 24 March)
• Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax (Saturday, 23 March)
• Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax (Saturday, 23 March)
• Re: LANG: A proposal for the layering problem (Saturday, 23 March)
• Re: LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax (Saturday, 23 March)
• LANG: OWL non-xml syntax (Saturday, 23 March)
• Re: LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax (Saturday, 23 March)
• Re: LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax (Saturday, 23 March)
• LANG: RDF Striped syntax, a reference (Friday, 22 March)
• LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: classes as instances (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: first language proposal (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Integrating XML Schema and OWL (Monday, 18 March)
• SEM: Integrating XML Schema and OWL (Monday, 18 March)
• LANG: collections (Monday, 18 March)
• GUIDE: Ontology for a simple XML Infoset (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Saturday, 16 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Saturday, 16 March)
• Collection properties, was Re: SEM DESIDERATA: my initial desiderata list (Saturday, 16 March)
• Re: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Thursday, 14 March)
• Moving forward (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: owl:Ontology (Thursday, 14 March)
• LANG: Example ontology declaring XML Schema equivalence (Thursday, 14 March)
• LANG: owl:Ontology (Thursday, 14 March)
• LANG: daml:collection and owl:seq, owl:set, owl:oneOf (Wednesday, 13 March)
• XML datatypes (Tuesday, 12 March)
• USE CASES: science applications (Tuesday, 12 March)
• LANG,GUIDE: Using XQuery types to specify XML valued datatype properties (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Wednesday, 6 March)
• LANG: GEDCOM N3 as RDFxt (Wednesday, 6 March)
• regrets for 3/7 (Tuesday, 5 March)
• LANG: Strawman syntax was RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it (Tuesday, 5 March)
• SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Tuesday, 5 March)
• LANG: Re: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it (Tuesday, 5 March)
• LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it (Tuesday, 5 March)
• rdf:parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Focus are summary (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Monday, 4 March)

Jonathan Dale

• Regrets for 28 March Teleconf (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Regrets for 21 Mar Teleconf (Thursday, 21 March)

Jos De_Roo

• Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter? (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: TEST/SEM: sem-intersection test (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: WOWG: first language proposal (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: WOWG: first language proposal (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Saturday, 23 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: SEM DESIDERATA: my initial desiderata list (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: TEST: sameGuy: pls report results from software you develop/use (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: an owl use/test case: sameGuy thru UnambigousProperty (Thursday, 7 March)
• WOWG: TEST: 2nd draft message (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Sunday, 3 March)
• TEST: entailment test cases (Saturday, 2 March)

larry.eshelman@philips.com

• Re: ADMIN: Sign up please (Wednesday, 6 March)
• LANG: language features (Monday, 4 March)

Leo Obrst

• REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? (Friday, 29 March)
• regrets for tomorrow's telecon (Wednesday, 27 March)
• ADMIN: probable regrets (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: ADMIN: Minutes of teleconf 28 Feb '02 (for review) (Tuesday, 5 March)
• QUERY, MISC: Definition of Provenance? (Saturday, 2 March)

Libby Miller

• Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: ADMIN: regrets (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: DAML query language (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: TEST draft message (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: QUERY, MISC: Definition of Provenance? (Sunday, 3 March)

Lynn Andrea Stein

• Re: LANG: classes as instances (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: SEM DESIDERATA: my initial desiderata list (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: LANG, SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: ISSUES: First draft of open issues document. (Tuesday, 5 March)

Marwan Sabbouh

• Re: DAML query language (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: DAML query language (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: Next steps (Action: all) (Friday, 1 March)

Michael Sintek

• TEST, ANN: TRIPLE, and Re: ADMIN: Sign Up Please (Monday, 4 March)

Mike Dean

• Re: TEST: first steps (Friday, 1 March)

Nick Gibbins

• ADMIN: Regrets for 2002-03-28 telecon (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: WOWG: IMPORTANT - name issue (Monday, 25 March)
• Apologies for 2002-03-07 telecon (Friday, 1 March)

Ora Lassila

• LANG: frame paradigm (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: Next steps (Action: all) (Friday, 1 March)

Pat Hayes

• Re: Moving forward (Sunday, 17 March)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: SEM, LANG: initial decision tree doc (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: LANG: OWL non-xml syntax (Sunday, 24 March)
• Re: LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?) (Friday, 22 March)
• SEM, LANG: initial decision tree doc (Thursday, 21 March)
• RE: SEM: semantics for current proposal (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: LANG: classes as instances (Thursday, 21 March)
• SEM: semantics for current proposal (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Tuesday, 19 March)
• RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Saturday, 16 March)
• Re: SEM DESIDERATA: my initial desiderata list (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: ADMIN: Minutes from Teleconf, 14 Mar 2002 (Review) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: Moving forward (Thursday, 14 March)
• SEM DESIDERATA: my initial desiderata list (Thursday, 14 March)
• SEM: informal note on the layering landscape (Wednesday, 13 March)
• ADMIN: minutes for Mar 7 telecon (Thursday, 7 March)
• RE: LANG: first sketch (Thursday, 7 March)
• RE: WOWG: Charter issues (was RE: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn 't cut it) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: WOWG: Charter issues (was RE: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: SEM: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: Layering on what? was: Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Sunday, 3 March)
• Re: how to proceed with building OWL [was Re: semantics: layering ...] (Saturday, 2 March)
• more on a same-syntax extension from RDF(S) to OWL (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: semantics: layering...? [was: Next steps (Action: all)] (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: WOWG: Consensus, subgroups, and e-mail tags (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: semantics: layering...? [was: Next steps (Action: all)] (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: how to proceed with building OWL [was Re: semantics: layering ...] (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: semantics: layering...? [was: Next steps (Action: all)] (Friday, 1 March)
• how to proceed with building OWL [was Re: semantics: layering ...] (Friday, 1 March)

Raphael Volz

• AW: LANG: collect idiom for inclusion in the language (Tuesday, 12 March)
• LANG: collect idiom for inclusion in the language (Thursday, 7 March)
• Requirements Document back online (Tuesday, 5 March)
• AW: ADMIN: Sign Up Please (Monday, 4 March)

ruediger.klein@daimlerchrysler.com

• MISC: Workshop on Semantic Web in Design and Engineering (Thursday, 21 March)
• DAML query language (Thursday, 7 March)

Said Tabet

• ADMIN: Regrets for March 28 Telecon (Thursday, 28 March)
• RE: GUIDE: Re: WSCL "well-formerdness" concept (Thursday, 21 March)
• ADMIN: regrets (Thursday, 14 March)
• RE: ADMIN: Sign Up Please (Monday, 4 March)

shimizu

• Re: ADMIN: current focus group primaries (Thursday, 7 March)

Smith, Michael K

• RE: AGENDA: telecon Mar 28 (Wednesday, 27 March)
• SEM: Formalization exercise (Tuesday, 26 March)
• RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: SEM Solipsistic answers to Peter's entailments and Paradox (Sunday, 17 March)
• ADMIN: Modified Minutes from Teleconf, 14 Mar 2002 (Review) (Friday, 15 March)
• ADMIN: Minutes from Teleconf, 14 Mar 2002 (Review) (Thursday, 14 March)
• RE: LANG: first sketch (Thursday, 7 March)
• RE: WOWG: Charter issues (was RE: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn 't cut it) (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn't cut it (Tuesday, 5 March)
• RE: ISSUES: First draft of open issues document. (Tuesday, 5 March)
• ISSUES: First draft of open issues document. (Monday, 4 March)

Stanton, John

• Regrets for F2F - Stanton - DOD (Tuesday, 19 March)

Stefan Decker

• Admin: Notes Telecon 28 March (Saturday, 30 March)
• Regrets (Thursday, 21 March)
• TEST: sameGuy: it works with TRIPLE (Monday, 11 March)

Stephen Buswell

• RE: ADMIN: regrets (Thursday, 14 March)
• RE: Focus are summary (Tuesday, 5 March)
• RE: ADMIN: Sign Up Please (Monday, 4 March)

Thompson, Lynne R

• Belated Regrets 3/28 Telecon (Thursday, 28 March)
• Regrets for 3/21 Telecon (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: LANG: first sketch (Thursday, 7 March)
• RE: ADMIN: agenda/logistics Mar 7 (Thursday, 7 March)

Ziv Hellman

• belated Regrets for 28 March Telecon (Sunday, 31 March)
• RE: SEM: semantics for current proposal (Thursday, 21 March)

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2002 05:46:55 UTC