- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 13:56:55 +0100
- To: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
- CC: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Jeff Heflin wrote: > Finally, an important issue will be finding a way to map your abstract > syntax into XML/RDF and still preserve its simplicity. I believe that in > order to get a good, intuitive syntax, we'll have to seriously consider > dropping the idea of using triples to represent the language, i.e., do > not layer on top of RDF Schema (but this is a point I've already raised > in another thread). OWL (Lite) looks very much like a refined version of RDF Schema. Leaving out charter and technical issues for the moment, I am not sure how we can explain to future OWL users it is not layered on top of RDF Schema. Guus -- A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 15 NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Tel: +31 20 525 6793 Fax: +31 20 525 6896; E-mail: schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl WWW: http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.html
Received on Thursday, 28 March 2002 08:00:14 UTC