Jeff Heflin wrote: >>Finally, an important issue will be finding a way to map your abstract >>syntax into XML/RDF and still preserve its simplicity. I believe that in >>order to get a good, intuitive syntax, we'll have to seriously consider >>dropping the idea of using triples to represent the language, i.e., do >>not layer on top of RDF Schema (but this is a point I've already raised >>in another thread). Jos De_Roo wrote: > I haven't seen anything in the past 3 years that would motivate > such an idea, really, http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Overview.html Jos, Can you clarify what you mean by "such an idea"? Do you not see to the need "to map the abstract syntax into XML/RDF and still preserve its simplicity" or to " not layer on top of RDF Schema" ? Frank. ----Received on Thursday, 28 March 2002 01:37:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:29 GMT