Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter?

[...]

> What does it cost?
>
> 1) existing RDFS agents will not be able to understand your WebOnt
> ontologies (they can understand small portions of DAML+OIL ontologies.)
>
> 2) people may need to convert existing RDF Schemas in order to use
> WebOnt
>
> Honestly, that's all I can think of. Maybe someone else can suggest
> more?

we find it very useful to have that "least power thing"
and so to have stuff like "triple integrated circuits"
(can't imagine to loose that)

--
Jos De Roo