W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter?

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 00:39:32 +0100
To: "Jeff Heflin <heflin" <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
Cc: "Jonathan Borden <jonathan" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, "WebOnt <www-webont-wg" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF1B798CAF.8F6A0DC8-ONC1256B8B.0080F8EF@agfa.be>

[...]

> What does it cost?
>
> 1) existing RDFS agents will not be able to understand your WebOnt
> ontologies (they can understand small portions of DAML+OIL ontologies.)
>
> 2) people may need to convert existing RDF Schemas in order to use
> WebOnt
>
> Honestly, that's all I can think of. Maybe someone else can suggest
> more?

we find it very useful to have that "least power thing"
and so to have stuff like "triple integrated circuits"
(can't imagine to loose that)

--
Jos De Roo
Received on Friday, 29 March 2002 18:40:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:48 GMT