W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: Is a non-RDF triples syntax out of charter?

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 00:39:32 +0100
To: "Jeff Heflin <heflin" <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
Cc: "Jonathan Borden <jonathan" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, "WebOnt <www-webont-wg" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF1B798CAF.8F6A0DC8-ONC1256B8B.0080F8EF@agfa.be>


> What does it cost?
> 1) existing RDFS agents will not be able to understand your WebOnt
> ontologies (they can understand small portions of DAML+OIL ontologies.)
> 2) people may need to convert existing RDF Schemas in order to use
> WebOnt
> Honestly, that's all I can think of. Maybe someone else can suggest
> more?

we find it very useful to have that "least power thing"
and so to have stuff like "triple integrated circuits"
(can't imagine to loose that)

Jos De Roo
Received on Friday, 29 March 2002 18:40:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:42 UTC