W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 21 Mar 2002 07:28:40 -0600
To: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1016717320.26064.69.camel@dirk>
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 06:55, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 3. Interpretations
> An OWL interpretation, I, over a datatyping scheme DT consists of 
> 	R, nonempty, disjoint from V	the domain of resources 

As noted in the design discussions for DAML+OIL, I don't
see sufficient justification for making V disjoint
from R.

It seems silly not to be able to talk about the intersection
of two sets of strings, or UniqueProperty's whose
range is dates, or whatever.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2002 08:28:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:42 UTC