Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?)

From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
Subject: Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 17:10:25 +0100

> Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> > A pointer to the literature should not be met with arguments,
> > even in jest, about ``intimidation''.
> 
> 
> Well, I guess it's my turn to apologise then.
> My remark was made purely in jest.
> Apologies if it offended anyone.
> 
> Frank.
>     ----
> 

Thanks.  I'm guitly of overreacting, and for that I apologize.

peter