W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: semantics: layering...? [was: Next steps (Action: all)]

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 08:05:21 -0500
To: connolly@w3.org
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20020301080521D.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Subject: semantics: layering...? [was: Next steps (Action: all)]
Date: 28 Feb 2002 13:42:38 -0600

> On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 12:41, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> > >   3. Semantics: As evidenced by the layering discussion, developing
> > > the semantic model for the language (mandated by our charter) is not
> > > easy, but needs to be done.  We expect to produce both a model theory
> > > and an axiomization similar to the ones prepared for DAML+OIL.
> > 
> > Well there has been work done on the layering issues, but it seems to have
> > been put off and put off again from the agenda.  Therefore, I would like to
> > have an agenda item for next week on the layering issue.
> 
> 
> I've been studying the layering stuff, but I'm not sure
> how to prepare for a telcon discussion of layering.
>
> If you have anything in particular in mind, please let me/us know.

Well there are a number of things that you could think of, including
1/ How you want the syntax of OWL to look in general
   (RDF graphs, RDF/XML, XML, other).
2/ How you want OWL to relate to RDF(S)
   (extension, close compatability, loose compatability).
3/ How powerful you want OWL to be
   (defined classes or restrictions, transitive roles, ...). 
I believe that not all the choices above are possible and that some of the
possible choices have bad consequences.

> It takes me a while to get the relevant stuff swapped in
> my brain to discuss that layering stuff. Also, I have an internal
> telcon on Tuesdays, and if you can get me something before
> then, I can discuss it with some other folks in
> preparation for a telcon.

[...]

> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/


peter
Received on Friday, 1 March 2002 08:05:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:48 GMT