W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > March 2002

RE: WOWG: Charter issues (was RE: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn 't cut it)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 12:07:02 -0500
To: michael.smith@eds.com
Cc: hendler@cs.umd.edu, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20020306120702V.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Well right now N-triples only show up in the test cases document, so I
don't see how they can be considered to be ``the'' syntax.

peter

From: "Smith, Michael K" <michael.smith@eds.com>
Subject: RE: WOWG: Charter issues (was RE: RE: parseType="daml:list" doesn	't  cut it)
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 10:26:39 -0600 

> > After all, the primary syntax for RDF is (still) defined in XML.
> 
> This is one of those things I seem to keep tripping over.
> 
> I thought it was asserted that triples are "the" syntax for RDF because
> there were assertions that could be made using triples that could not be
> made using the XML syntax. And not just statements that amount to renaming
> of bnodes.  
> 
> If this is wrong, I stand corrected.  
> 
> - Mike
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2002 12:07:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:48 GMT