On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 11:18, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > I am currently unclear whether the intent is for subgroups to have their own > telecon's from time to time. I think the term 'subgroup' has been used a few times, but it's a misnomer. These are 'focus areas', not subgroups. Subgroups involves subgroup chairs and all that; i.e. more work for the team contact. I'd like to not go there just yet. > Or is the idea to put the subgroup business that needs to be talked about in > the main telecon? I hope that will suffice. > (e.g. I think agreeing the initial phase of the test group's work needs some > phone time. Perhaps including partitioning the tasks). > > Jeremy > > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Monday, 4 March 2002 12:47:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:48 GMT