W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > March 2002

RE: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:42:41 -0000
To: "Ian Horrocks" <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Libby Miller" <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, "webont" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDOEHJCDAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

> 
> [1] 
http://www-lti.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~clu/papers/archive/lutzdiss.pdf



Ian,

I don't think I have time to read 225 pages ... :(

Is there a shorter version of the central argument?

Jeremy

Received on Friday, 22 March 2002 05:43:25 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jeremy Carroll: "LANG: OWL Light and triples"
Previous message: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: LANG: Nested Class definitions and the RDF striped syntax"
In reply to: Ian Horrocks: "Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?)"
Next in thread: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?)"
Reply: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?)"
Reply: Ian Horrocks: "RE: SEM: semantics for current proposal (why R disjoint V?)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:48 GMT