Saturday, 31 March 2001
Friday, 30 March 2001
Tuesday, 30 November 900
Thursday, 29 March 2001
- Great BBQ SAUCE RECIPE
- Re: Specifying Datatype Atoms in Regular Expressions
- Re: [Fwd: XML Schema Part 2 should provide BNF for all primitive types.]
- request for clarification: "validation rule: datatype valid"
- Specifying Datatype Atoms in Regular Expressions
- "fixed" property of "length" facet.
- An Invitation from the Asia-Pacific Rim
- Re: About XML Schema Structures Part
Wednesday, 28 March 2001
Tuesday, 27 March 2001
- RE: [Fwd: XML Schema Part 2 should provide BNF for all primitive types.]
- XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes
- RE: [Fwd: XML Schema Part 2 should provide BNF for all primitive types.]
- RE: [Fwd: XML Schema Part 2 should provide BNF for all primitive types.]
- RE: [Fwd: XML Schema Part 2 should provide BNF for all primitive types.]
- Re: [Fwd: XML Schema Part 2 should provide BNF for all primitive types.]
- RE: [Fwd: XML Schema Part 2 should provide BNF for all primitive types.]
- RE: [Fwd: XML Schema Part 2 should provide BNF for all primitive types.]
- another error in "List Type" example in Schema Primer
- error in example in Schema primer
- Character reference in regular expressions
- [Fwd: XML Schema Part 2 should provide BNF for all primitive types.]
Monday, 26 March 2001
- confusing footnote
- list, union values of blockDefault in <schema>, should be finalDefault values instead?
Saturday, 24 March 2001
Friday, 23 March 2001
- Clarification Request: Exclusive-Inclusive Derivations
- BUSSINESS OPPS.IN AMERICA TREASURE +MORE
- Make Money With our Investor E-Mail
- schema error
- Re: ComplexType derivation by restriction
- Re: inconsistency in Schema Structures PR vis. element block attribute
- Re: inconsistency in PR vis. simpleType final attribute
- ComplexType derivation by restriction
- xmlschema-formal: more comments
- RE: xmlschema-formal: Inference rules
- XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes
Thursday, 22 March 2001
- RE: xmlschema-formal: Inference rules
- xmlschema-formal: Inference rules
- semantics of "length" facet
- definition of "language" type
- float/double :conversion from lexical space to value space
- xmlschema-formal: wildcard processing
- incomplete sentence in Schema primer
- Seperating simple and complex types
- xmlschema-formal: targetNamespace problems
- xmlschema-formal: incorrect component constructor
- RE: Comment on double data type
Wednesday, 21 March 2001
- Definition of "\w" multi-character escape
- How do I
- Comment on double data type
- A critique of constraining facets
- A critique of fundamental facets
- Re: Is "final" attribute inherited?
Tuesday, 20 March 2001
- RE: Datatypes, Section 5.2.5 (3/16/2001)
- Datatypes, Section 5.2.5 (3/16/2001)
- RE: XML Schema: Formal Description is now published
- problem with the structures DTD
- Re: Is "final" attribute inherited?
- Re: Is "final" attribute inherited?
- Is "final" attribute inherited?
- Re: Naming inconsistency
- please remove relation '<=' from "duration" type.
- Lexical value of "duration" type.
- Problem in canonical representation of "time" type.
- Order relation of gMonth type
Monday, 19 March 2001
- About XML Schema Structures Part
- Re: simple types = complex types (sometimes) ?
- simple types = complex types (sometimes) ?
- style change in section 2.2.2 "Global Elements and Attributes"
- typo in section 2.2.2 "Global Elements and Attributes"
- Comment on Table 1
- comment on Table 1
Sunday, 18 March 2001
Saturday, 17 March 2001
Friday, 16 March 2001
- Re: Question about inheritance/derivation in the XML-Schema datatype specification
- RE: Question about inheritance/derivation in the XML-Schema datatype specification
- Re: Question about inheritance/derivation in the XML-Schema datatype specification
- Question about inheritance/derivation in the XML-Schema datatype specification
Thursday, 15 March 2001
- RE: Error in datatypes.dtd
- Persistent skin problem? 32465
- Qualify your candidates with testing software!!
- Website, Design, hosting and maintenance for only $999.00 per year
Wednesday, 14 March 2001
Monday, 12 March 2001
- Schema Parsing
- Re: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
- Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
- RE: Feedback about XML schema CR
- Re: CR-53 Response: Add built-in base64Binary and hexBinary types?
- Re: CR-15 response: Value Space of ID
Friday, 9 March 2001
- Some about facets etc...
- Re: CR-31 Response: Should xml:lang be allowed by default in all complex types?
- Re: Changes to date/time datatypes
- Re: Feedback about XML schema CR
- Feedback about XML schema CR
- Re: CR-14 value space of entities, notations, IDREFs
- Re: Resolution to CR-17
- Re: CR-14 value space of entities, notations, IDREFs
- Re: CR-14 value space of entities, notations, IDREFs
- Re: CR-48: Change canonical form of URIs for builtin datatypes and facets
- Re: CR-33 adding a formal grammar for regexes
Thursday, 8 March 2001
- Re: CR-48: Change canonical form of URIs for builtin datatypes and facets
- resolution of issue CR-43
- CR 24 - Commentator (AsIr S VeDaMuThU) is satisfied
- Re: Resolution to CR-36
- RE: URIs and information typing
- $9.95 Website Hosting
- Re: URIs and information typing
- Resolution to CR-17
- Resolution to CR-36
Wednesday, 7 March 2001
- URIs and information typing
- RE: what should I expect for validation of attributes of typeQNam e?
- Re: Is there an indicator or constraint on the root element?
- CR-33 adding a formal grammar for regexes
- CR-14 value space of entities, notations, IDREFs
- Is there an indicator for the root element?
- Is there an indicator or constraint on the root element?
- Re: CR-56: Specify text/xml or application/xml
- RE: Beta 4
Tuesday, 6 March 2001
- Re: what should I expect for validation of attributes of type QName?
- Re: Omission in <element> constraint in Schema Structures spec
- Re: Omission in <element> constraint in Schema Structures spec
- Re: CR-22: Allow negative scale? WG response
- Re: what should I expect for validation of attributes of typeQName?
- Re: what should I expect for validation of attributes of type QName?
- RE: builtin type for contentType (aka mime type)
Monday, 5 March 2001
- Re: CR-56: Specify text/xml or application/xml
- Re: Omission in <element> constraint in Schema Structures spec
- RE: CR-41 resolution
- Omission in <element> constraint in Schema Structures spec
- CR-22: Allow negative scale? WG response
- CR 47 Response: Allow simple types to be final? abstract?
- Re: XML schema DTD not well formed?
- Re: XML schema DTD not well formed?
- Re: XML schema DTD not well formed?
- XML schema DTD not well formed?
- minor typo in Abstract, I think
Sunday, 4 March 2001
- StockContests.com - Get $500 FREE Every Week And Win Cash & Prizes!
- CR-31 Response: Should xml:lang be allowed by default in all complex types?
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Survey for XML Schema CR-37: Default prefix for schema namespace]
- builtin type for contentType (aka mime type)
Saturday, 3 March 2001
Friday, 2 March 2001
Thursday, 1 March 2001
- Re: unresolved MPEG-7 queries/issues
- RE: SimpleContent question
- Re: unresolved MPEG-7 queries/issues
- Re: SimpleContent question
Tuesday, 27 February 2001
Monday, 26 February 2001
Thursday, 22 February 2001
- Re: CR-49: XPath subset: Use subset not full XPath for Key and KeyRef
- Re: CR-49: XPath subset: Use subset not full XPath for Key and KeyRef
Wednesday, 21 February 2001
- Re: Error in the spec (#3)
- Re: Error in the spec (#3)
- Re: CR-49: XPath subset: Use subset not full XPath for Key and KeyRef
- Re: CR-49: XPath subset: Use subset not full XPath for Key and KeyRef
- Error in the spec (#3)
- Error in the spec (#2)
Tuesday, 20 February 2001
- Error in the spec
- Re: CR-49: XPath subset: Use subset not full XPath for Key and KeyRef
- Inheritance and Identity-constraint
- Re: URIs for primitive datatypes and facets?
- Re: CR-49: XPath subset: Use subset not full XPath for Key and KeyRef
Monday, 19 February 2001
- Re: <attributeGroup ref="..." use="prohibited"/> not in spec
- <attributeGroup ref="..." use="prohibited"/> not in spec
- Re: CR-49: XPath subset: Use subset not full XPath for Key and KeyRef
- Re: CR-49: XPath subset: Use subset not full XPath for Key and KeyRef
Sunday, 18 February 2001
Saturday, 17 February 2001
Friday, 16 February 2001
- Re: CR-18 Response: Validating XPointer IDREFs?
- Re: CR-49: XPath subset: Use subset not full XPath for Key and KeyRef
- RE: Arbortext dissent on OASIS request to allow locating schemas via public ids
- Re: CR-49: XPath subset: Use subset not full XPath for Key and KeyRef
- RE: Constraining facets for ID,IDREF,ENTITY, QName & NOTATION
- RE: Part 2 (Datatypes): whiteSpace not fixed
- RE: subtyping
- RE: what does "finite-length" mean?
- RE: Unicode database non-normative reference
Thursday, 15 February 2001
- Re: include and import
- Arbortext dissent on OASIS request to allow locating schemas via public ids
- Re: include and import
- Re: include and import
- include and import
- Re: CR-18 Response: Validating XPointer IDREFs?
Wednesday, 14 February 2001
- E-mailPublicity A-3043
- CR-53 Response: Add built-in base64Binary and hexBinary types?
- CR-18 Response: Validating XPointer IDREFs?
- CR-37 Response: Change the namespace defaults in DTD for Schemas?
- Re: question on attributes
- RE: Streaming Validation
Tuesday, 13 February 2001
- Wht '<=' ? rather than '<'?
- Re: exclusive enumeration
- CR-49: XPath subset: Use subset not full XPath for Key and KeyRef
- RE: exclusive enumeration
- exclusive enumeration
Monday, 12 February 2001
- Re: Implementation comments
- Re: Derivation by Extension: {content type} of {base type definition}
- Re: anyType
- Re: Pointless use of simpleType
- Re: Naming inconsistency
- Re: Poorly researched observations on <xsd:key>, <xsd:keyref> and <xsd:unique>
- Re: Poorly researched observations on <xsd:key>, <xsd:keyref> and <xsd:unique>
- Re: SOX reference
Sunday, 11 February 2001
Saturday, 10 February 2001
Friday, 9 February 2001
- RE: Poorly researched observations on <xsd:key>, <xsd:keyref> and <xsd:unique>
- RE: Poorly researched observations on <xsd:key>, <xsd:keyref> and <xsd:unique>
- Re: XSDL best practices question/suggestions
- RE: order relation of timeDuration [let timeDuration be a union]
- RE: Streaming Validation
- question on attributes
Thursday, 8 February 2001
Wednesday, 7 February 2001
Thursday, 8 February 2001
Wednesday, 7 February 2001
- RE: Streaming Validation
- Re: Streaming Validation
- Streaming Validation
- Re: Redefinition
- Redefinition
- Re: ##other for anyAttribute
- ##other for anyAttribute
Tuesday, 6 February 2001
- Re: List Type Delimiter?
- List Type Delimiter?
- Web Hosting
- Re: Redefinition : validity of the redefined schema
Monday, 5 February 2001
- Redefinition : validity of the redefined schema [error fixed]
- Redefinition : validity of the redefined schema
- Re: itemType for list
- Re: itemType for list
- itemType for list
- Re: Digit required before/after decimal point?
Wednesday, 7 March 2001
Saturday, 3 February 2001
Friday, 2 February 2001
Wednesday, 31 January 2001
Friday, 2 February 2001
Thursday, 1 February 2001
- RE: CR-21: Drop use of xsi:type as determinant for unions?
- Is inifinite precision of dateTime mandatory for all processors?
- IT Services at the most competitive price
- Modifying whiteSpace facet
- Re: semantics of whitespace facet
Wednesday, 31 January 2001
- Re: derivation by list
- schema redefinitions [ schema A redefines schema B and B redefines A]
- Re: derivation by list
- derivation by list
Tuesday, 30 January 2001
- order relation of timeDuration
- lexical value of timeDuration
- Re: lexical value of decimal type
- allCLEAR
- Re: lexical value of decimal type
- Re: Inconsistency between Primer and Structures
- XSDL best practices question/suggestions
- RE: CR-44 response: should xsi:type be dropped?
Monday, 29 January 2001
- CR-44 response: should xsi:type be dropped?
- CR-25 response: Change the name of the CDATA Type
- RE: what should I expect for validation of attributes of type QName?
- RE: unique/key/keyref identity-constraints
- RE: SOX reference
- RE: scale facet for integer
- Inconsistency between Primer and Structures
- unique/key/keyref identity-constraints
- redefinition of schema components
- Implementation comments
Saturday, 27 January 2001
Monday, 22 January 2001
Saturday, 27 January 2001
- Re: what should I expect for validation of attributes of type QName?
- RE: what should I expect for validation of attributes of type QName?
- scale facet for integer
- range facet of ENTITY type
Friday, 26 January 2001
Thursday, 25 January 2001
- RE: binary datatype
- RE: Allow CDATA sections in strings
- Allow CDATA sections in strings
- Re: CR-39 Permitting ID attribute on facet element information items
- CR-39 Permitting ID attribute on facet element information items
- locating schemas via public ids
- SOX reference
- Re: CR-20 wildcard-minus: Make wildcard namespace selection more powerful?
- Meaning of fixed attribute on pattern facet where more than one pattern element is present and not all say fixed
- Re: CR-40: Changed default value of block?
- binary datatype
Wednesday, 24 January 2001
- total order of float
- Re: lexical value of decimal type
- Re: lexical value of decimal type
- lexical value of decimal type
- RE: what should I expect for validation of attributes of type QName?
- Re: semantics of whitespace facet
- Sofware Development from Russia ($15-$20 per hour)
- semantics of whitespace facet
- RE: what should I expect for validation of attributes of type QNa me?
- Re: CR-56: Specify text/xml or application/xml
- Re: what should I expect for validation of attributes of type QNa me?
- RE: what should I expect for validation of attributes of type QNa me?
- Derivation by Extension: {content type} of {base type definition}
- Re: what should I expect for validation of attributes of type QName?
- Re: Resolution of CR-16
Tuesday, 23 January 2001
- RE: CR-34 response: Clarify restriction and extension of wildcard attributes
- CR-50 response: IDREF and Union Types
- CR-34 response: Clarify restriction and extension of wildcard attributes
- CR-15 response: Value Space of ID
- Re: Resolution of CR-51
- Resolution of CR-51
- Re: Resolution of CR-51
- Resolution of CR-16
- Resolution of CR-51
- RE: Resolution of CR-35
- Resolution of CR-35
- what should I expect for validation of attributes of type QName?
- Re: Mixed type fields
Monday, 22 January 2001
- Re: Mixed type fields
- CR-55: Restore 0 and 1 as Boolean values
- RE: Mixed type fields
- Help with {base type definition} for lists and unions
- RE: Simple types: Part 1 versus Part 2
- Re: CR-56: Specify text/xml or application/xml
- Re: CR-56: Specify text/xml or application/xml
- Re: CR-56: Specify text/xml or application/xml
- Re: Mixed type fields
- Re: Names of identity constraint definitions
- Re: Complex-typed fields
- Re: Identity constraints and default namespace
- CR-40: Changed default value of block?
- CR-21: Drop use of xsi:type as determinant for unions?
- CR-48: Change canonical form of URIs for builtin datatypes and facets
- CR-56: Specify text/xml or application/xml
Sunday, 21 January 2001
- Mixed type fields
- Names of identity constraint definitions
- Complex-typed fields
- Identity constraints and default namespace
Saturday, 20 January 2001
Friday, 19 January 2001
Thursday, 18 January 2001
- Simple types: Part 1 versus Part 2
- Re: Feedback on candidate recommendation
- Re: XML Schema features
- XML Schema features
Sunday, 14 January 2001
Wednesday, 17 January 2001
Tuesday, 16 January 2001
- Re: defn "string" across XML infoset/query/schema, I18N specs
- Re: defn "string" across XML infoset/query/schema, I18N specs
- Re: Feedback on candidate recommendation
- question
- Re: [Re: {item type description} of lists derived by restriction]
- Re: [Re: {item type description} of lists derived by restriction]
- Re: {item type description} of lists derived by restriction
- {item type description} of lists derived by restriction
Sunday, 14 January 2001
Friday, 12 January 2001
- Re: Digit required before/after decimal point?
- Re: attribute declration's use property and restriction
- Image Communications Inc..
- Image Communications Inc..
Thursday, 11 January 2001
- XML Schema feedback
- RE: About those "non-deterministic content model" errors
- RE: About those "non-deterministic content model" errors
- attribute declration's use property and restriction
- Re: Digit required before/after decimal point?
- Re: Feedback on candidate recommendation
- Re: More on QName expansion
- Digit required before/after decimal point?
- More on NOTATION
- More on QName expansion
- nonPositiveInteger should allow +0
Wednesday, 10 January 2001
- Re: MPEG-7 Problem Issues and Queries
- RE: About those "non-deterministic content model" errors
- Re: Feedback on candidate recommendation
- Re: MPEG-7 Problem Issues and Queries
- RE: About those "non-deterministic content model" errors
- RE: MPEG-7 Problem Issues and Queries
- Re: Defaulted values and identity_constraint checking
Tuesday, 9 January 2001
- RE: About those "non-deterministic content model" errors
- RE: About those "non-deterministic content model" errors
- RE: About those "non-deterministic content model" errors
- RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices (touches XHTML modularization als o)
- FW: About those "non-deterministic content model" errors
- RE: How to use list?
- Re: Part 1 - Clause 4.3.2
- Re: How to use list?
- Re: Part 0 - Clause 4.1
- Re: subtyping
- RE: CR Feedback and Implementation
- Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices (touches XHTML modularization als o)
- Re: CR Feedback and Implementation
Monday, 8 January 2001
- RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices (touches XHTML modularization als o)
- A Curious and Interesting Opportunity!!
- RE: Feedback on precision of Decimal type.
- Re: Feedback on precision of Decimal type.
- Re: base64Binary and hexBinary
Sunday, 7 January 2001
Friday, 5 January 2001
Saturday, 6 January 2001
Friday, 5 January 2001
- RE: schemas: can I restrict an elem's content based on att value?
- RE: schemas: can I restrict an elem's content based on att value
- RE: schemas: can I restrict an elem's content based on att value?
- Re: precise definition needed for establishing identity between components that may appear multiple times (via import)
- Re: Substitution Groups?
- Re: Meaning of block="substitution"?
- Re: Schema DTD doesn't allow xmlns attributes on <annotation>
- A decouvrir
Thursday, 4 January 2001
- xsi:null is not the same as DB NULL
- Re: String values with spaces in Enumerations
- RE: Default values for block and final
- Re: Default values for block and final
- Re: Defaulted values and identity_constraint checking
- String values with spaces in Enumerations
- Re: LC-16 ( LC-132 ): Allow arbitrary order with occurrence > 1
- Re: keyRefs
- Re: Import and change target namespace is desirable
- Re: Feedback on candidate recommendation
- How to use list?
- Re: Derivation by restriction
- Re: Defaulted values and identity_constraint checking
- Re: Default values for block and final
- Re: Attributes and extension
Wednesday, 3 January 2001
- defn "string" across XML infoset/query/schema, I18N specs
- Attributes and extension
- Re: Attributes and content model within complexType
Tuesday, 2 January 2001
- RE: Scoping of IDREF value space when doing selective validation
- Scoping of IDREF value space when doing selective validation
- Attributes and content model within complexType
- Re: MPEG-7 Problem Issues and Queries
- RE: MPEG-7 Problem Issues and Queries
- Re: MPEG-7 Problem Issues and Queries